Gooch's average was 36.9 following the 1989 Ashes debacle. His final Test century, a double hundred against New Zealand in 1994, got it up to 44.8. Ended up finishing 5.7 runs higher than he was at the start of 1990.Great poll. Am gonna have to think through and vote. One guy never averaged below 40 in his entire career. And another one who upped his average by 4 points or so in the last third of his. Overall consistency versus superior peak. Tight one actually.
Gooch’s average of 37 up to then was disappointing and highlights a lack of consistency. I have always felt that some great performances before 1990 like his tour of WI in 1980/81 and the runs at home to them in 1988 prove it was class shining through instead of an insane purple patch. It is difficult to know if he would have ended up averaging more or less if he didn’t go to SA, but he did score heavily on that tour and I think it was after the ban he became a class player.Such a tough call. It's tempting to go for Gooch because it's currently 16 years since we debuted a decent opening bat, and I'd pay hard cash for someone like him at the top of the order now. But even then, it depends of which version of Gooch we're talking about. 1990 to 1994 is a no brainer in his favour. Prior to that, it's Gower by a mile, even if Gooch's 36.9 average up to 1989 is way better than what we've seen from any recent openers. In the end, I was swayed by broader issues. Gooch got himself banned for three years for taking the rand in 1982, and, 18 months after his return, declared himself unavailable for the 1986/87 Ashes. Gower could have gone to SA in 1982 but chose not to. And he never ducked out of an Ashes tour. So I'll go for the guy who is more likely to be available.
Gooch's record against those 1980s WI attacks was borderline extraordinary. Hopefully his actual average in those matches won't make a mockery of that statement; perhaps someone could look it up. But I suspect that it's significantly higher than his career average of 37 by the end of 1989. Oddly, he also played spin pretty well too. It was the in-between stuff that did for him in the 1980s, Alderman the obvious example in 1981 and 1989.Gooch’s average of 37 up to then was disappointing and highlights a lack of consistency. I have always felt that some great performances before 1990 like his tour of WI in 1980/81 and the runs at home to them in 1988 prove it was class shining through instead of an insane purple patch. It is difficult to know if he would have ended up averaging more or less if he didn’t go to SA, but he did score heavily on that tour and I think it was after the ban he became a class player.
Agree that Gower deserves credit for not going to SA.
Yeah Alderman in 89 is the well-documented example, but Gooch got stuck against gentle medium pace on a number of occasions. Few times against Lanka in the 80s, home to India 1979 and 1986, away to New Zealand 1992 etc.Gooch's record against those 1980s WI attacks was borderline extraordinary. Hopefully his actual average in those matches won't make a mockery of that statement; perhaps someone could look it up. But I suspect that it's significantly higher than his career average of 37 by the end of 1989. Oddly, he also played spin pretty well too. It was the in-between stuff that did for him in the 1980s, Alderman the obvious example in 1981 and 1989.
Massive fan of Gooch, but he was disappointing outside Tests against WI before the 90s and I have no problem with it working against him in comparisons to consistent players who may not have been capable of what he could produce at his best. Think it was after the ban when his steely reputation of churning out a professional performance every single innings developed.Having done a bit of homework, it appears that Gooch averaged 34.8 against everyone else by the end of 1989, compared to 41.8 against WI. Your earlier point about him improving after the 1982-84 ban was correct actually. Even against non-WI attacks, he averaged 39 from 1985 to 1989, and that includes his horror show against Alderman in 1989. I wonder what would have happened if England hadn't lost another batch of openers due to the second SA tour in 1990. Gooch was 36 by then and had averaged 20 in the 1989 Ashes. It's possible that the selectors could have called time on Gooch's career and/or restored Gatting to the captaincy.
Yeah it's a cliche but Gower is certainly one of those that could have even better. Someone made an interesting point that he would have been suited to central contracts which he has said before. Very good player though still.Gower was a natural, great timer of the ball, with great hand eye coordination, but Gooch really worked hard on this batting and had a professional attitude towards the game. Had Gower taken his game more seriously he would definitely been an all time great.
I really love Gower bat but for me Gooch was probably England's best batter in the 80s and early 90s. One of the few batsmen of that era who scored plenty against the mighty West Indian attacks, home and away.