He made a century in his last test...Clarke's used up his goodwill with the CA hierarchy.
Besides he's 34 in April, injury prone and his best is probably well and truly behind him.
Makes perfect sense to move on.
yeahTBBH Clarke persisting in the pyjama format was never going to end happily, either for his biographers or his back. Interesting that back during Homeworkgate, it was Clarke + the establishment vs. the dressing room. Now it's allegedly vice versa.
Either way, corks popping in the Watson household aws.
You reckon? You'd want your players fit for the WC. If we get one or two early injuries, carrying an unfit guy into the tournament could backfire.the idea that clarke must be fit for a game against bangladesh is madness when you think about it
Where the bloody hell is she?Someone link this **** to Lara Bingle plz
You can replace an injured player whenever you like though. The only caveat is that the replacement is permanent. If a player is injured but may recover later, it actually makes perfect sense to take him in tbh.You reckon? You'd want your players fit for the WC. If we get one or two early injuries, carrying an unfit guy into the tournament could backfire.
That's all true, but I'm talking more stability. Clarke needs to prove his fitness as early as possible. Watson and Marsh are as likely as not to do a hammy early in the tournament.You can replace an injured player whenever you like though. The only caveat is that the replacement is permanent. If a player is injured but may recover later, it actually makes perfect sense to take him in tbh.
Dude our ODI captaincy is like a revolving door and we're still doing fine.That's all true, but I'm talking more stability. Clarke needs to prove his fitness as early as possible. Watson and Marsh are as likely as not to do a hammy early in the tournament.