• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Cricket stuff that doesn't deserve its own thread

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yes, that's why I hope they show pace bowling from different angles on TV for people to realise how quick they really are. Especially for us Indian fans since we think we are good enough to face International pace bowlers and it's all easy:laugh:
Best way to appreciate the speed of quick bowling is to go to the nets in the days leading up to a test match and watch them from about two metres behind the batsman.

Saw Patto sending them down in the scg nets one session and it was ridiculous.
 

Spark

Global Moderator

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
It's a good article but I'm surely not the only one who read this and went "okay that's all good, but give us some perceived speeds for some bowlers for us to digest"
I think the writer points out there is technology in baseball that could be tried out for cricket. Perceived speed is one but I am more interested in the spin and things like that. We have known for a while now that even the speeds we measure only take the horizontal axis into account and not the vertical axis.
 

Shri

Mr. Glass
everything related to broadcast in sa is broken af atm

maybe they have always been this ****ty and the guys have distracted us all so far by showing us hot chicks in the crowd

i won't pay attention to the speed guns this series and manually guess by eye who looks quick tbh
 

cnerd123

likes this
There has been an updated in the ICC Men's T20I playing conditions

In-match Penalty for Slow Over Rates - The ICC Cricket Committee recently considered the ongoing issue with slow over rates which are at historically low levels. The introduction of penalty points for slow over rates in the World Test Championship and Cricket World Cup Super League competitions have both led to a slight improvement in the Test and ODI format. However, over rates in Twenty20 Internationals continue to decline.

The ICC Cricket Committee received encouraging reports on the in-game penalty that was applied in the recent ECB competition The Hundred, where a team that had not started its last over within the permitted time had to bring one extra fielder inside the circle for the remaining overs. This was recommended for use in T20 international cricket by the Cricket Committee to CEC and approved. Consequently, it has been agreed that the in-match penalty in The Hundred should be applied to all men’s and women’s T20 Internationals.
  • The new playing condition covers two scenarios as they relate to an uninterrupted match, or a delayed or interrupted match.
  • In a normal match with no reduction in overs, the fielding side must be in a position to bowl the first ball of the final over of the innings by the scheduled or re-scheduled time for the innings to have ended. If they are not, one fewer fielder will be permitted outside of the field restriction area for the remaining overs of the innings.
  • In a delayed or interrupted match where there has been a reduction of 3 or more overs, the fielding side must be in a position to bowl the first ball of the penultimate over of the innings by the scheduled or rescheduled time for the innings. The rationale is that a reduced overs / interrupted game is generally more likely to be one where there are peripheral matters (beyond those set out in 12.8.3 of the playing conditions) affecting the ability of the fielding side to genuinely progress the game at the required rate. The minimum 3 over leeway is given so that the umpires in such games do not have to contrive additional time allowances and can instead be confident that applying the same principles to such an innings will lead to a fair outcome. This was previously covered in part in clause 12.8.5.1 of the playing conditions (in the case of an innings that has been reduced due to any delay or interruption in play, an additional allowance of 1 minute for every full 3 overs by which the innings is reduced will be granted) which has been deleted as it is now covered in this new clause.
  • Refer to clause 13.8.
Interval for Drinks - during the recent men’s T20 World Cup a drinks break was introduced to the playing conditions which was taken at the mid-point of the innings. The drinks break was well received and there is no reason why it should not be available to bi-lateral T20Is. We have therefore agreed to include the provision for a drinks break in bi-lateral T20Is which is optional, not mandatory. Both of the participating Member Boards must agree to use the drinks break in matches played between their teams prior to the start of the match/series.
  • Clause 11 has been updated accordingly.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
So now slow over rates arent just being punished with fines or bans but actually forcing a fielding team to change their fields? This seems like a pretty terrible move. What exactly does it accomplish?
 

Top