• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Beautiful moments on the cricket field

royGilchrist

State 12th Man
ok thats fine.

Still, first of all I dont understand who would be stupid enough to chuck in a unimportant match.

And secondly from the evidence I have seen, Shoaib chucks, and so does Murali and Brett Lee. And all this bent arm and stuff is just an excuse.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
royGilchrist said:
ok thats fine.

Still, first of all I dont understand who would be stupid enough to chuck in a unimportant match.

And secondly from the evidence I have seen, Shoaib chucks, and so does Murali and Brett Lee. And all this bent arm and stuff is just an excuse.
Just an excuse? It's been medically proven! In Shoaib's and Murali's cases.
As for Lee, God knows. I don't think he chucks but if you just looked at one angle you might think he did.
Honestly, Shoaib has leaned on a surface and pushed his arms out into the hyper-extended position on a live camera. If that's not proof enough, what is?
 

royGilchrist

State 12th Man
:)

I dont know about medical proofs, all I know is when you see Shoaib bowling he clearly chucks on a few deliveries, and so does murali. Getting science and physical deformities into it just blurs things. I think it should be simple, give the power to the umpires. Yeah I know thats not the perfect solution but better than this scientific proof.

Getting scientific proofs is just making excuses as far as I am concerned.
 

Fred Jr

Cricket Spectator
one of my favourite moments would have to be Alec Stewart receiving the badly-spelt bat at the Oval - I was there, and there was a real feeling among the crowd that we were watching an era ending right before our eyes. it was really something special. good luck in the future Stewie, you did us proud.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
royGilchrist said:
:)

I dont know about medical proofs, all I know is when you see Shoaib bowling he clearly chucks on a few deliveries, and so does murali. Getting science and physical deformities into it just blurs things. I think it should be simple, give the power to the umpires. Yeah I know thats not the perfect solution but better than this scientific proof.

Getting scientific proofs is just making excuses as far as I am concerned.
Yes, it's an excuse - a damn valid one! If science can't make a definitive decision, it's hardly likely anything else can!
If you ask me, decisions like these should be made making use of all the technology and resources you can, not on an Umpire's whim. The human eye is such a fallible instrument.
Are you really saying you think Shoaib's arm is bent forwards (ie with an angle of less than 180 degrees)? Because everyone who's ever studied the matter scientifically has come-up with the conclusion that this isn't the case. It only ever bends to an angle greater than 180 degrees, and there's absolutely nothing anyone can do about that.
Murali, meanwhile, can't bend his arm to a 180 degree angle. That's a simple fact. You don't really need advanced medical proof to work this out. If someone believes (and a great many ignorant Australians do seem to) that this means his action cannot be legal, it is discrimination against the physically disabled.
Murali does not straighten his arm from the shoulder point onwards and hence, by the laws, his action is legal. So is Shoaib's, and James Kirtley's.
 

PY

International Coach
This is way OTT and OT at the same time.

This has been argued to death already, dredge up the old thread with about 600 posts and keep this one positive. 8D

:)
 
Last edited:

Langeveldt

Soutie
Richard said:
that this means his action cannot be legal, it is discrimination against the physically disabled.
You wouldnt let a physically disabled person fly an airplane, so why should they be able to play absolute top level sport??? Its not discrimination against Murali, Shoaib and co, its being fair to the large proportion of bowlers who dont have disabilaties....
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Langeveldt said:
You wouldnt let a physically disabled person fly an airplane, so why should they be able to play absolute top level sport??? Its not discrimination against Murali, Shoaib and co, its being fair to the large proportion of bowlers who dont have disabilaties....
Agreed to an extent, but this really isn't the thread to be discussing this.

Happy thoughts....
 

gibbsnsmith

State Vice-Captain
A beautiful moment well in club cricket was when, one of my schools fastest bowler was getting smacked by some powerhouse and my then captain suggested to bowl a yorker..he did try but ended in beinmg a full toss straight for his gems..and he wasnt wearing a cup..wasnt pretty for him i bet

But unfortunatley all my team [expecially me] were cracking up on the ground with laughter...he decided to bat on..smacked him for a 4 next ball, got out after that...

funny game..we won..i got my first and only duck...
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Richard said:
So that was when this started?
It was indeed!

If I remember rightly, someone said that the century (against tired bowlers who had the game wrapped up) proved AA's true class as an International All Rounder.

It started as ridicule, but developed into worship.
 

Top