• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Barry Richards and Dennis Lillee vs Sunil Gavaskar and Fred Trueman

Barry/Lillee vs Sunny/Freddie


  • Total voters
    15

DrWolverine

International Vice-Captain
1. Clive Lloyd dropped his spinners and had a four pronged pace attack with his job at stake after the devastating loss to Australia.

2. Michael Holding bowls four bouncers an over and a beamer in an over. He says the ball accidentally slipped from his ball. In the very next over, he proceeds to deliver another beamer and gives the lame excuse the ball slipped again.

Bouncers aren’t wrong.
Lloyd encouraged his pacers to bowl beamers.
Lloyd stooped very low to save his job.
 

DrWolverine

International Vice-Captain
"they did not aplaud for my shots waahhhhhhhhhh! they laughed at my shots waaaaaaaah"

– Sunil Gavaskar.

Jesus christ, that whole section is pathetic to read
There was a bloodthirsty mob, Michael Holding bowling beamers but that is the stuff you concentrate on.
 

Johan

International Coach
There was a bloodthirsty mob, Michael Holding bowling beamers but that is the stuff you concentrate on.
If Holding bowled 2-3 Beamers that's not gonna kill anyone, if it was a "bloodthirsty mob" then Indian team wouldn't have left the stadium alive, what really happened is West Indies crowd acted like any crowd with strong pacemen from the time and Sunny found it unacceptable that they acted like Australians or English crowds would've.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
That's wrong too, 1976 England was the start of the WI era.
That was the first match WI truly embraced going all out on pace. The Series was level going into that match with India chasing a record score just the match before. Even after all the bouncer barrages, retired hurts (Gaekwad top scored) and declaration at 6 down, India got pretty close to their 1st innings total.
 

Johan

International Coach
That was the first match WI truly embraced going all out on pace. The Series was level going into that match with India chasing a record score just the match before. Even after all the bouncer barrages, retired hurts (Gaekwad top scored) and declaration at 6 down, India got pretty close to their 1st innings total.
Yeah but I prefer going by when Viv made the 232 and Greenidge came into his own.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I'll be real here, the entire thing is overblown, if the Indian bats can't handle what the English, Australian and Carribean bats regularly had to handle with each other, maybe they should start focusing on Golf.
But the others did whinge about it then too. Otherwise the laws wouldn't have been changed. And helmets wouldn't have been introduced.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
If Holding bowled 2-3 Beamers that's not gonna kill anyone, if it was a "bloodthirsty mob" then Indian team wouldn't have left the stadium alive, what really happened is West Indies crowd acted like any crowd with strong pacemen from the time and Sunny found it unacceptable that they acted like Australians or English crowds would've.
If a crowd is actively saying kill kill then they deserve to be criticized.
 

Top