Bad Umpiring?

[ColdSnow]

I just read on cricinfo that Australia won the second test in controversial fashion with a load of umpiring decisions going against India during the second test. I did not see this match and was thus wondering what the umpiring blunders were in this match (against both teams in both innings). Can someone please tell me?

 

[shortpitched713]

Read the official thread mate.

 

[ColdSnow]

Read the official thread mate.

I couldn't find my question answered in that thread A page number perhaps...

 

[sledger]

check the BBC website, its all over there.

 

[ColdSnow]

From BBC:

"Australia were 134-6 in their first innings when Symonds, on 30 at the time, got a thick edge to Ishant Sharma."

I think that had symonds been given out at that stage, India may well have won this test match.

 

[The Sean]

I couldn't find my question answered in that thread A page number perhaps...

You won't find much discussion of the controversy in the official thread, TBH. It all flew very much under the radar.

 

[silentstriker]

You won't find much discussion of the controversy in the official thread, TBH. It all flew very much under the radar.

Hah.

 

[Manee]

I just read on cricinfo that Australia won the second test in controversial fashion with a load of umpiring decisions going against India during the second test. I did not see this match and was thus wondering what the umpiring blunders were in this match (against both teams in both innings). Can someone please tell me?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z125uLHDlUU

 

[ColdSnow]

yeah as far as im concerned, India should have won this match.

symonds was out thrice in that unbeaten innings.

 

[thealder]

tendulkar was plum lbw on 36 and he was given not out

 

[jeevan]

tendulkar was plum lbw on 36 and he was given not out

That would make it 7 poor decisions against India and 2 poor decisions against Australia.
May be eight in case Proctor is unable to come up with the evidence upon which he has put a ban on Harbhajan.