Oh for sure that's what should happen but at least this is a startSo the amnesty is effective IF they cut their ties with the ICL. Which means no amnesty at all for those who stay with the ICL whilst increasing the pool of players available for the IPL with those who do want to switch. Not quite the move towards free movement of labour that should have always been there in the first place.
Or am I missing something?
Were we expecting otherwise?Im not sure what this means. Doesnt seem to offer much apart from to further try and damage the ICL.
It's almost like this whole debacle was designed to destroy any chance for greatness Bond ever had, Mohammed Yousuf to an extent too. Such a shame.I don't hold out much hope for Bond to be around long, but I'd be very interested in Daryl Tuffey.
Reckon if he comes back he'll remain a wasted talent TBH. Criminal.I don't hold out much hope for Bond to be around long, but I'd be very interested in Daryl Tuffey.
Thing is, Read is actually the best OD batsman of those who keep wicket in county cricket. All it'd take would be for the selectors to realise this and give him a decent ODI run.Didn't realise Read was in the ICL, England seem set on going for batting ability rather than ability behind the stumps (selecting Prior says that in the strongest possible terms) so it probably won't effect his career.
Very debateable that either of those two ever had a serious chance of greatness. Bond was a late starter whose excellence when he was on the park and injury-proneness were intertwined (his bowling action was a large part of what made him good and so much to do with what made him injury-prone).It's almost like this whole debacle was designed to destroy any chance for greatness Bond ever had, Mohammed Yousuf to an extent too. Such a shame.