kyear2
Hall of Fame Member
Well let's hope they get out voted.some have the plan to give the gloves and #6 to Sangakkara, Miller at 7, Imran at 8, Ambrose at 9, Barnes at 10, Murali at 11.
Well let's hope they get out voted.some have the plan to give the gloves and #6 to Sangakkara, Miller at 7, Imran at 8, Ambrose at 9, Barnes at 10, Murali at 11.
I can see that, but not being a majority opinion. I’m also going to say specifically for Sanga and Walcott, giving them the gloves feels like a huge mistake considering the amount of output you’d lose. Plus Sanga at 6 feels very off. Kallis you can see at 6… Sanga not so much, at least for me.some have the plan to give the gloves and #6 to Sangakkara, Miller at 7, Imran at 8, Ambrose at 9, Barnes at 10, Murali at 11.
Yeah this is the most likely outcome although a couple of people would really be batting out of position. Doesn't bother me much, but I guess other people might beI doubt it. Likely the team will end up with both of them. Kallis is close enough to the next batters in line (who they are exactly may vary depending on who you ask) that his bowling and fielding makes him an almost certainty for the last extra spot. Imran and Knott will likely take the other spots.
The strange motivations you have.centurymaker and wolverine will cry themselves to bed that Barnes won, nice.
I think Barnes is a better bowler, makes the attack more unique and gives you more variety especially given I'm going to pick Imran for third seamer.Steyn was the better choice and compliment to Ambrose.
Kallis just beings too much to a team to get past the 2nd XI.Yeah this is the most likely outcome although a couple of people would really be batting out of position. Doesn't bother me much, but I guess other people might be
You're a waste of time when you don't reply a question and just repeat yourself, yes.Someone is a waste of time because they don't answer questions the way you phrase them?
How the **** am I biased against players on weaker teams?
Where I find you full of **** is where you try to distort what I'm trying to say to fit your narrative.
Giving someone credit for something doesn't discredit players who didn't, but credit is given where it is due.
Well you know my position on Barnes, and that's not changing.I think Barnes is a better bowler, makes the attack more unique and gives you more variety especially given I'm going to pick Imran for third seamer.
You do understand that people can just disagree, and trying to bully someone to your position just doesn't work right?You're a waste of time when you don't reply a question and just repeat yourself, yes.
You are biased against weaker teams because you in your own words give extra points to guys like McGrath and Marshall by virtue of their role in ATG sides that you don't for Hadlee of him making a mediocre team competitive, which is objectively a bigger achievement if you want to go down this road.
Barnes potentially makes the 2nd XI attack a more dangerous one honestly.I think Barnes is a better bowler, makes the attack more unique and gives you more variety especially given I'm going to pick Imran for third seamer.
This would shock me more than any of the other alternate suggestions in this threadHammond can make it with the bat alone, I think it will be Hammond-Smith-Lara-Kallis-Knott/Ames-Imran
swing both ways, huge cutters both ways, and the Barnes ball/Reverse Barnes ball swayed my vote.And Sten and Imran do compliment each other. Steyn is the classic away swinger and Imran in..
Great so you agree you do give weaker team players less points.You do understand that people can just disagree, and trying to bully someone to your position just doesn't work right?
That literally no one alive has ever seen.swing both ways, huge cutters both ways, and the Barnes ball/Reverse Barnes ball swayed my vote.
But if it's true, it's a game changer and Barnes is the greatest bowler ever.That literally no one alive has ever seen.
We'll agree to disagree
Beating up on hapless SA doesn't get me there.But if it's true, it's a game changer and Barnes is the greatest bowler ever.
Yeah I agree, swing both ways, cutters so large that people couldn't believe it was a cutter, I think only Alec Bedser's famed Leg cutter equals Barnes's, extra pace and bounce off the wicket and can bowl overs in a similar quantity as Tate, Bedser and Fazal IE almost spinner levels, and he's just so much different than the other two (Ambrose and Imran) in both speed and modus operandi. Makes the attack very dangerous and varied imoBarnes potentially makes the 2nd XI attack a more dangerous one honestly.
Who is better seam bowler, Barnes or McGrath?
Trial version:Keep it as is then ig
World XI | World A | ||
1. JB Hobbs ![]() | 1. SM Gavaskar ![]() | ||
2. L Hutton ![]() | 2. H Sutcliffe ![]() | ||
3. DG Bradman* ![]() | 3. WR Hammond ![]() | ||
4. SR Tendulkar ![]() | 4. BC Lara ![]() | ||
5. IVA Richards ![]() | 5. SPD Smith ![]() | ||
6. GSA Sobers ![]() | 6. J Kallis ![]() | ||
7. AC Gilchrist+ ![]() | 7. APE Knott+ ![]() | ||
8. RJ Hadlee ![]() | 8. IAN Khan* ![]() | ||
9. MD Marshall ![]() | 9. CEL Ambrose ![]() | ||
10. SK Warne ![]() | 10. SF Barnes ![]() | ||
11. GD McGrath ![]() | 11. M Muralitharan ![]() |