• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

All-Time World XIs: Discussion Thread

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
some have the plan to give the gloves and #6 to Sangakkara, Miller at 7, Imran at 8, Ambrose at 9, Barnes at 10, Murali at 11.
I can see that, but not being a majority opinion. I’m also going to say specifically for Sanga and Walcott, giving them the gloves feels like a huge mistake considering the amount of output you’d lose. Plus Sanga at 6 feels very off. Kallis you can see at 6… Sanga not so much, at least for me.
 

Thala_0710

International Captain
I doubt it. Likely the team will end up with both of them. Kallis is close enough to the next batters in line (who they are exactly may vary depending on who you ask) that his bowling and fielding makes him an almost certainty for the last extra spot. Imran and Knott will likely take the other spots.
Yeah this is the most likely outcome although a couple of people would really be batting out of position. Doesn't bother me much, but I guess other people might be
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah this is the most likely outcome although a couple of people would really be batting out of position. Doesn't bother me much, but I guess other people might be
Kallis just beings too much to a team to get past the 2nd XI.

Though to be honest, can almost say the same about Hammond and the 1st. Almost...
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Someone is a waste of time because they don't answer questions the way you phrase them?

How the **** am I biased against players on weaker teams?

Where I find you full of **** is where you try to distort what I'm trying to say to fit your narrative.

Giving someone credit for something doesn't discredit players who didn't, but credit is given where it is due.
You're a waste of time when you don't reply a question and just repeat yourself, yes.

You are biased against weaker teams because you in your own words give extra points to guys like McGrath and Marshall by virtue of their role in ATG sides that you don't for Hadlee of him making a mediocre team competitive, which is objectively a bigger achievement if you want to go down this road.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
I think Barnes is a better bowler, makes the attack more unique and gives you more variety especially given I'm going to pick Imran for third seamer.
Well you know my position on Barnes, and that's not changing.

And Sten and Imran do compliment each other. Steyn is the classic away swinger and Imran in..
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
You're a waste of time when you don't reply a question and just repeat yourself, yes.

You are biased against weaker teams because you in your own words give extra points to guys like McGrath and Marshall by virtue of their role in ATG sides that you don't for Hadlee of him making a mediocre team competitive, which is objectively a bigger achievement if you want to go down this road.
You do understand that people can just disagree, and trying to bully someone to your position just doesn't work right?
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I think Barnes is a better bowler, makes the attack more unique and gives you more variety especially given I'm going to pick Imran for third seamer.
Barnes potentially makes the 2nd XI attack a more dangerous one honestly.

Who is better seam bowler, Barnes or McGrath?
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
If Smith is focused, and that's always a big if, though he did have a flawless performance in SL.

But ifffff he's inspired by the two folks next to him, a keeper cordon of Knott, Hammond, Kallis and Smith is not only peerless as a group and missing nothing, but pulling off the spectacular.

But again, the if...
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Barnes potentially makes the 2nd XI attack a more dangerous one honestly.

Who is better seam bowler, Barnes or McGrath?
Yeah I agree, swing both ways, cutters so large that people couldn't believe it was a cutter, I think only Alec Bedser's famed Leg cutter equals Barnes's, extra pace and bounce off the wicket and can bowl overs in a similar quantity as Tate, Bedser and Fazal IE almost spinner levels, and he's just so much different than the other two (Ambrose and Imran) in both speed and modus operandi. Makes the attack very dangerous and varied imo
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Keep it as is then ig
Trial version:

World XIWorld A
1. JB Hobbs 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿1. SM Gavaskar 🇮🇳
2. L Hutton 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿2. H Sutcliffe 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
3. DG Bradman* 🇦🇺3. WR Hammond 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
4. SR Tendulkar 🇮🇳4. BC Lara 🇹🇹
5. IVA Richards 🇦🇬5. SPD Smith 🇦🇺
6. GSA Sobers 🇧🇧 6. J Kallis 🇿🇦
7. AC Gilchrist+ 🇦🇺7. APE Knott+ 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
8. RJ Hadlee 🇳🇿8. IAN Khan* 🇵🇰
9. MD Marshall 🇧🇧9. CEL Ambrose 🇦🇬
10. SK Warne 🇦🇺10. SF Barnes 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
11. GD McGrath 🇦🇺11. M Muralitharan 🇱🇰
 

Top