• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

All-Time World XIs: Discussion Thread

Thala_0710

International Captain
You rated Trueman higher before changing your opinion, as always you're being hypocritical simply because you want a guy to be better but you don't have a valid argument to make for it.
Nothing to do with that, if one learn's something new or see's the logic in another argument, there's no problem in changing his opinion. Actually having the exact same opinion of every player ever, for a long period of say 10 years, sounds more stupid
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Dude.....

And yes I agree. If you don't call Barry an ATG, 19 tests vs England can't qualify O'Reilly over an Ashwin either.

It's a hilarious double standard.
Crazy how you removed 8 Tests from O'Reilly just because you could
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Nothing to do with that, if one learn's something new or see's the logic in another argument, there's no problem in changing his opinion. Actually having the exact same opinion of every player ever, for a long period of say 10 years, sounds more stupid
No it's just hilarious how you are so high on the Barry glaze when we both know you don't value peer reputation all that much, you're mad for some reason because I said Barry with his 4 Tests and far inferior FC career is not better than Boycott with 100+ Tests, much longer and greater FC career and so forth. It's actually hilarious.
 

Thala_0710

International Captain
No it's just hilarious how you are so high on the Barry glaze when we both know you don't value peer reputation all that much, you're mad for some reason because I said Barry with his 4 Tests and far inferior FC career is not better than Boycott with 100+ Tests, much longer and greater FC career and so forth. It's actually hilarious.
I'm not mad at all. It's absolutely fine to rate Barry below Boycott. In fact if someone rates him below Duckett or Jaiswal as well because he didn't have an actual test career, I'm fine with that as well. My only issue is pretending Barry over Greenidge is fine but Barry over Boycott is some mad opinion.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
FC averages

Boycott – 56.8
Barry – 54.7
Greenidge – 45.9

"How can you have Boycott>Barry>Gordon Johan? 🤓"
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
I'm not mad at all. It's absolutely fine to rate Barry below Boycott. In fact if someone rates him below Duckett or Jaiswal as well because he didn't have an actual test career, I'm fine with that as well. My only issue is pretending Barry over Greenidge is fine but Barry over Boycott is some mad opinion.
Yeah because Boycott is a mile above Greenidge.
 

PlayerComparisons

International Captain
I'm not mad at all. It's absolutely fine to rate Barry below Boycott. In fact if someone rates him below Duckett or Jaiswal as well because he didn't have an actual test career, I'm fine with that as well. My only issue is pretending Barry over Greenidge is fine but Barry over Boycott is some mad opinion.
It’s not like no one has Greenidge over Boycott…I think most agree they’re very close


 

Thala_0710

International Captain
Yeah because Boycott is a mile above Greenidge.
Which is where we differ then... Also pretty funny considering Greenidge actually beat Boycott on CW, so it really can't be that mad, and I myself have Boycott over Greenidge, and also how much you hate Chanderpaul but have absolutely no issues with how Boycott batted.
 

Top