aussie tragic
International Captain
Worst all-time XI I've ever seen......silentstriker said:
- Ian Botham
- Miller
- Sobers
- Gilchrist (+)
- Imran Khan
- Flintoff
- Hadlee
- Marshall
- Trueman
- Curtly Ambrose
- Glenn McGrath
Worst all-time XI I've ever seen......silentstriker said:
- Ian Botham
- Miller
- Sobers
- Gilchrist (+)
- Imran Khan
- Flintoff
- Hadlee
- Marshall
- Trueman
- Curtly Ambrose
- Glenn McGrath
silentstriker said:
- Ian Botham
- Miller
- Sobers
- Gilchrist (+)
- Imran Khan
- Flintoff
- Hadlee
- Marshall
- Trueman
- Curtly Ambrose
- Glenn McGrath
aussie tragic said:Worst all-time XI I've ever seen......
Sure. But when you get bowled out for 15, don't come changing your mind.aussie tragic said:Can I have some of the weed you're smoking.....![]()
Mate, I'm so confident I'll name an XI to smack your team and they aren't even in the 1946-2006 XI:silentstriker said:Sure. But when you get bowled out for 15, don't come changing your mind.
LOL @ Hayden trying to go up against a real pace attack. Plus, your bowlers would realize that they shouldn't get wickets of fellow bowlers on the other side because then the dirty little batsmen would win. So they'd just feed free boundaries to the side, until Laker comes on, and then I'll stick Ambrose on him with a bat and no one will help a stinking spinner as he's getting clubbed.aussie tragic said:Hayden
Boycott
Ponting
Chappell
Waugh
Miller
Marsh
Imran
Hadlee
Trueman
Laker
Why is Imran not in the opening bowler list? I thought you said you were going to include Imran/Miller/Botham in that? Also, I think it's rather absurd that Miller and Botham will go on to the final bowler poll on the strength of 1 votes each (as it stands currently). If I had wanted to, I could've voted strategically for Imran here to ensure he gets to the final bowler poll. However, I voted for who is the best player. Frankly, I think Imran deserves to be in that final bowler poll and you should put him in, regardless of whether he gets the ridiculous one or two votes needed to go through.aussie tragic said:LOL as Imran is not going to get into the final bowler poll (Botham and Miller are runner-ups with one vote)
Sweet! I call on all Imran fans to vote for him so he's included in the final bowler poll option. Right now, all he would need is one more vote to qualify, as absurd as that is. In fact, if it's within rules and precedent, I would like to ask AT to change my vote to Imran.nightprowler10 said:Imran, just to screw things up a bit.
The best method is to include all 3 (Imran/Miller/Botham) in the final bowler option. The runner-up rule, which works well most of the time, doesn't work in this case. The overwhelming majority picked Sobers for being the deserving choice in this poll. However, if the same group of people had to list a "2nd" choice, the votes wouldn't be so clear-cut. So for Imran, or Miller, or Botham to sneak through as runner-ups based on receiving like 2 or 3 votes is ridiculous. Let's put all 3 in the next poll!silentstriker said:If we're going to use the runner up only rule, then I change my vote to Imran too.
Fusion said:The best method is to include all 3 (Imran/Miller/Botham) in the final bowler option. The runner-up rule, which works well most of the time, doesn't work in this case. The overwhelming majority picked Sobers for being the deserving choice in this poll. However, if the same group of people had to list a "2nd" choice, the votes wouldn't be so clear-cut. So for Imran, or Miller, or Botham to sneak through as runner-ups based on receiving like 2 or 3 votes is ridiculous. Let's put all 3 in the next poll!
Hahaha that would drive me nuts!Lillian Thomson said:I tend to agree, I would have voted for Botham had the immortal Sir Garfield not been a factor, so chuck 'em all in. I don't expect any of them in the final line-up but there's no reason to exclude any of them.
What would be interesting is if a load of Ricky Ponting fans vote him as runner-up in this poll.![]()
Disagree.silentstriker said:Irrelevant. Put Lara in for Sachin, it doesn't matter. But putting both in is a mistake.