31 runs conceded without a legal delivery hahaha

[Unattainableguy]

http://cricketnext.in.com/news/pakistani-pacer-sets-unique-record/36294-13.html

his figures 0-0-31-0 (10 NB).
indeed very unique record

 

[Athlai]

Wow. What a shocker.

 

[Richard]

 

[Storer]

. Unbelievable.

 

[NZTailender]

Haha, bizarre


Coming this summer to a sports quiz near you!

 

[Craig]

 

[roseboy64]

Poor guy.

 

[Michaelf7777777]

Probably the worst bowling figures I've seen for a while

 

[Matt79]

uag = thought was banned??

 

[Precambrian]

Bizzare.

What about this 77-run over (Yep, Seventy Seven)

 

[33/3from3.3]

Hahaha, OMG.

 

[Richard]

uag = thought was banned??

You're familiar with the seven-dayer policy used on CW, Matthew?

 

[Langeveldt]

Bizzare.

What about this 77-run over (Yep, Seventy Seven)

Not really relevant, that was totally contrived

 

[analyst]

Should we rule out match fixing ? Salim Malik is involved with Pakistani cricket again, so I wouldn't rule it out.

 

[Precambrian]

Not really relevant, that was totally contrived

Why not? The bowler is at blame even more.

 

[Richard]

Deliberate concession of massive numbers of runs in an over is different to uncompliant concession of such, though.

Under normal circumstances, no bowler ever tries to concede runs.

 

[Langeveldt]

Why not? The bowler is at blame even more.

Not really, the captains obviously told him to bowl ****

 

[Somerset]

Its not mentioned in the article included in the first post of this topic, but according to Cricinfo, the bowler that managed those figures still finished on the winning side - by nine wickets! Very bizarre...

It's the first story in this week's "The Week That Was":
http://content-nz.cricinfo.com/magazine/content/current/story/381126.html

 

[Jakester1288]

Poor bloke. Imagine how he would feel. And the bloke who got hit for 77 runs in 1 over.

Crazy stuff.

 

[Speersy]

"The over went as follows (the balls in bold are the legitimate ones) - 0444664614106666600401" hahaha