Is this feature now feasible after the upgrade?
Would work terribly on CW tbh.
Think how much better the CT thread would be if you cockblocked people with king in their username.
Link leads to nowhere
I wished for it as a moderator and I wish for it even more as a member of the proletariat.
Proudly supporting Central Districts
The Culture of Mediocrity is forever, and is proudly brought to you by New Zealand Cricket in association with Grant Bradburn Sports and the Unholy Alliance
RIP Craig Walsh
Cockblocking should only be used on CW in tour threads when the conversation degrades into nationalistic showboating. It should be used as a temporary warning by mods and needs to be a tool they can apply with some flexibility. If cockblocking is something that has to go to committee then it has no purpose behind it, it would be too slow and too methodical to really have any effect.
Why are we still calling it cockblocking? Call it threadblocking, FFS...
We miss you, Fardin. :(. RIP.
A cricket supporter forever
Member of CW Red and AAAS - Appreciating only the best.
Check out this awesome e-fed:
Because you don't block the thread from receiving posts, just block the cock from posting in it.....
"All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusions is called a philosopher." - Ambrose Bierce
Langeveldt: I of course blame their parents.. and unchecked immigration!
GingerFurball: He's Austrian, they tend to produce the odd ****ed up individual
Burgey: Be careful dealing with neighbours whose cars don't have wheels but whose houses do.
Uppercut: Maybe I just need better strippers
lol.. gotcha. still think postblocking sounds better
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)