Is this feature now feasible after the upgrade?
Would work terribly on CW tbh.
Think how much better the CT thread would be if you cockblocked people with king in their username.
Link leads to nowhere
I support GFs proposal and think it would be an excellent idea.
1) Ross is Boss.
2) See point 1.
Leading the charge against nuances being used in posts.
Overrated XI M Bracewell, Burns, Rahane, Don Voges, Bairstow, Alecz Day, Donovan Grobelaar, Luke Ronchi, Faulkner, Dan Christian, Permaul
RIP Philip Hughes - 1988-2014
The Wheel of Mediocrity | Compton, Root, Carberry, Robson, Trott, Lyth, Moeen, Hales | The wheel is forever
Founder and Grand Wizard of the CW Football Thread Statluminati. Potential hater of abilities. Blocked on twitter by Michael Vaughan, Brad McNamara and AtlCricket for my hard hitting truths.
Cockblocking should only be used on CW in tour threads when the conversation degrades into nationalistic showboating. It should be used as a temporary warning by mods and needs to be a tool they can apply with some flexibility. If cockblocking is something that has to go to committee then it has no purpose behind it, it would be too slow and too methodical to really have any effect.
Why are we still calling it cockblocking? Call it threadblocking, FFS...
We miss you, Fardin. :(. RIP.
A cricket supporter forever
Member of CW Red and AAAS - Appreciating only the best.
Check out this awesome e-fed:
Because you don't block the thread from receiving posts, just block the cock from posting in it.....
"All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusions is called a philosopher." - Ambrose Bierce
Langeveldt: I of course blame their parents.. and unchecked immigration!
GingerFurball: He's Austrian, they tend to produce the odd ****ed up individual
Burgey: Be careful dealing with neighbours whose cars don't have wheels but whose houses do.
Uppercut: Maybe I just need better strippers
lol.. gotcha. still think postblocking sounds better
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)