Haha, yeah. Love how its been argued that its possible that poor innocent Randiv didn't bowl a deliberate no ball despite the footage. Then its claimed that the SLC must have pressurised him to apologise because he wouldn't have done it because he's too much of a prick to do a thing like that. Here's a newsflash for them conspiracy theorists - who's likely to bowl a deliberate no ball? That's right, a prick!!