• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

All-Time World XIs: Discussion Thread

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
They also shouldn't count because the poster in question is irredeemably annoying and flip flops on every opinion he's got based on what's going to get him the most attention
That's simply untrue though. The user in question is one of the most stubborn one and hardly shifts his opinions.
 

Line and Length

International Coach
Well they are all ATG or near ATG batsmen and bloody fine with the gloves.
The obsession on CW with picking batsmen who are part-time keepers has been something I've noticed during my time here. Not only in selections such as this but in drafts.
Truly great keepers such as Knott, Ames, Healy are all more than adequate batsmen and their glovework sets the standard for the rest of the field. Being "fine" doesn't equate to being an ATG keeper.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
The obsession on CW with picking batsmen who are part-time keepers has been something I've noticed during my time here. Not only in selections such as this but in drafts.
Truly great keepers such as Knott, Ames, Healy are all more than adequate batsmen and their glovework sets the standard for the rest of the field. Being "fine" doesn't equate to being an ATG keeper.
Fully agree
 

Top