mackembhoy
International Regular
Mad how it's such a hard place to bat plenty of the time.It's Headingley, the pitch never ****ing deteriorates.
Yet can has these massive 4th innings chases throughout the years too.
Mad how it's such a hard place to bat plenty of the time.It's Headingley, the pitch never ****ing deteriorates.
TrueModern cricketers don't have the art of batsmanship. Maybe Root and Lokesh from this Test. The rest are very much just batters.
can't you just say Batsman in men's games and batswoman in women's games?It is so female cricketers are not excluded
No. This is not a thingTrue
James Vince is a Batsman
Harry Brook is a Batter
Sure, but in the laws of the game and such like they’re moving towards batter to be inclusive, so it’ll just become the termcan't you just say Batsman in men's games and batswoman in women's games?
GAGFCNo. This is not a thing
Probably notIs there going to be enough runs in the bank for the new ball to make a difference?
Alternatively, one doesn't want to be responsible for a wicket by briefly abandoning the match.I've reached the point where I have to find other things to do to distract myself from nervously checking the score.
Nothing gets me to take the bins out more than the endings of test matches
We all know you're not going to bed don't kid yourself.GAGFC
I'm going to bed. No point staying up for the final rites. Well done England blah blah blah
I reckon so. Bumrah couild easily take a batch of lower order wickets in no time at all.Is there going to be enough runs in the bank for the new ball to make a difference?
can we not just use the term batswoman and batswomen instead of neutering our language thoughIt is so female cricketers are not excluded
I think so, if a wicket falls before it.Is there going to be enough runs in the bank for the new ball to make a difference?
it must be so that transgender athletes don't feel excludedIt is so female cricketers are not excluded