Thala_0710
International Captain
Fair enoughBotham and Broad to me are pretty similar level bowling-wise. I just dont have Anderson that far ahead. They are near him.
Fair enoughBotham and Broad to me are pretty similar level bowling-wise. I just dont have Anderson that far ahead. They are near him.
Yeah, do not think I rate Kapil and Anderson in the same tier as bowlers, while Botham and Kapil are pretty equalish for me.Ummm..... I don't. I agreed he likely will be the tier below.
Kapil more consistent but Botham higher ceiling.Yeah, do not think I rate Kapil and Anderson in the same tier as bowlers, while Botham and Kapil are pretty equalish for me.
Guess what? I rate Kapil a bit higher than Botham.
Great thing we didn't meet back then, then.Botham, Warne and Lillee are guys I used to downplay in my earlier days due to anti-Anglo bias but have rediscovered my respect for recently.
To be frank, it was a reaction to my perception of them being overrated by Anglo press. Which they were, but it took time to see beyond that.Great thing we didn't meet back then, then.
Guess you were more fun back then...... Atleast didn't claim Lillee>AmbroseBotham, Warne and Lillee are guys I used to downplay in my earlier days due to anti-Anglo bias but have rediscovered my respect for recently.
Doubt it.Guess you were more fun back then...... Atleast didn't claim Lillee>Ambrose
What did I do to you?Doubt it.
Lillee is better than Ambrose. The fact that you don't even entertain this idea suggests you haven't thought about it critically enough and are getting swayed by CW consensus.Guess you were more fun back then...... Atleast didn't claim Lillee>Ambrose
I would have given you points had I rated Lillee the same as does majority on CW. I don't. I rate him 14th among pacers. Lindwall better.Lillee is better than Ambrose. The fact that you don't even entertain this idea suggests you haven't thought about it critically enough and are getting swayed by CW consensus.
So not just wrong but spectacularly wrong.I would have given you points had I rated Lillee the same as does majority on CW. I don't. I rate him 14th among pacers. Lindwall better.
He can't be outside the top 10.Lillee at 9 among pacers for me.
Lindwall I think is equal to Donald and Donald is rated higher than Lillee here even if I personally disagree.He can't be outside the top 10.
Hoggard must be like top 12 at least.I would have given you points had I rated Lillee the same as does majority on CW. I don't. I rate him 14th among pacers. Lindwall better.
*Says the one who rates Swann over Ashwin*So not just wrong but spectacularly wrong.
That's the series I use as the cut off point for Beefy, he had run his course and that rib injury reduced him from a medium-fast bowler (130ish) to Military medium. Played one series in 1987, and just came back for a couple tests with years of gap between them for purely monetary purposes.Basically around his last hurrah Ashes in Aus 86.
Interesting.Lillee is better than Ambrose. The fact that you don't even entertain this idea suggests you haven't thought about it critically enough and are getting swayed by CW consensus.