PlayerComparisons
International Captain
Two strike bowlers
Miller has more 10’fers thoI think its pretty straightforward on this poll to figure out the guys that always vote against the Indian player / only vote for the Australian. No real case for Miller, and no you don't have to wait for Bumrah's career to be finished to assess that,
Longevity. I don't expect it to still be true when Bumrah retires.What is the case for Miller, for those who voted?
I mean, Miller himself didn't really had a much long enough career due to WWII....Longevity. I don't expect it to still be true when Bumrah retires.
10 years to 6 and 55 matches to 36 is pretty significant.I mean, Miller himself didn't really had a much long enough career due to WWII....
but does that matter when someone has pretty much taken the same amount of wickets at a better average in far fewer tests10 years to 6 and 55 matches to 36 is pretty significant.
because it was a sh@ttier era.I think miller cops it because of his era. I don't know why, but they took less wickets per game back then.
Slower scoring era so less wickets and more drawsI think miller cops it because of his era. I don't know why, but they took less wickets per game back then.
Exactly why Trueman should be rated higher by this forum than it does.I think miller cops it because of his era. I don't know why, but they took less wickets per game back then.
totally agree btw, superstar in the running for the goatExactly why Trueman should be rated higher by this forum than it does.
Yea pretty underratedExactly why Trueman should be rated higher by this forum than it does.
why? He’s already better than Miller. Anything he does after this is gravyToo soon to rate Bumrah.