• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Sunil Gavaskar vs Ricky Ponting

Who is the better test batsman?


  • Total voters
    36

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
As much as Sunny rates higher among openers that Ponting does among middle order bats, I believe Punter was better and more impactful.
This is actually a hard question to answer (Gavaskar vs Ponting), and I can’t decide. But impactful? If Ponting wasn’t in the Australia side, they would have still been the best in the world with Hayden, McGrath, Warne, Gilchrist etc.


if Gavaskar wasn’t in the Indian side, they would have been way way worse than they already were.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
I can't see except of more runs and being more attacking; what more Ponting has going on for him.... He isn't even better than Dravid.
 

ma1978

International Debutant
I can't see except of more runs and being more attacking; what more Ponting has going on for him.... He isn't even better than Dravid.
Other than scoring more runs in a manner that enables matches to be won…

That’s precisely why Ponting wins
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Gavaskar scored fast runs when times called for it too.... I swear, the skill of sticking to the wicket gets way too much slack here.
My one issue with Sunil wasn't so much his strike rate, it's that as prolific as he undoubtedly was, he struggled vs anything resembling a good attack on anything outside of slow / flat / unresponsive pitches. It really would have been interesting to have seen him in WSC.
 

ma1978

International Debutant
My one issue with Sunil wasn't so much his strike rate, it's that as prolific as he undoubtedly was, he struggled vs anything resembling a good attack on anything outside of slow / flat / unresponsive pitches. It really would have been interesting to have seen him in WSC.
I don’t think he struggled any more than any other great player and I don’t think there isanywhere near enough sample size to draw a conclusion
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
I don’t think he struggled any more than any other great player and I don’t think there isanywhere near enough sample size to draw a conclusion
I believe I went through Australia and the West Indies, series, and the contrast was stark.
Yes every great player ever struggled when the ante was raised and they faced off against premier bowlers on helpful surfaces, but the great ones had break through performances. Not consistently great, but breakthrough performances.
When I first heard of Sunny's performances in the Caribbean, which is the calling card if it were, I was surprised how misleading the stats were. He also only was successful in Bourda and I think one match at the Queens Park Oval.

Please note, again not saying he wasn't a great batsman. He's in my AT XI.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
I believe I went through Australia and the West Indies, series, and the contrast was stark.
Yes every great player ever struggled when the ante was raised and they faced off against premier bowlers on helpful surfaces, but the great ones had break through performances. Not consistently great, but breakthrough performances.
When I first heard of Sunny's performances in the Caribbean, which is the calling card if it were, I was surprised how misleading the stats were. He also only was successful in Bourda and I think one match at the Queens Park Oval.

Please note, again not saying he wasn't a great batsman. He's in my AT XI.
Sunny has played 3 series in West Indies. Not mentioning the first he had a great one against an attack comprising of Holding and Garner; and a bad one against them at full force with Marshall averaging only 30. He also played Marshall twice in India; and was great in both of those series, averaging 90 in the first; and 54 In the second one, while Richards averaged 34 against a significantly weaker bowling lineup. He had three series in Australia; one against a weak bowling unit in which he was extremely successful, one against a great bowling unit where he was very unsuccessful (only a 50 in 6 innings) and another against a good bowling unit against whom he was moderately successful.
And let's be real for a moment; Gavaskar should had scored more in the '83 tour; Amarnath certainly did; but most ATG batsmen would definitely had struggled against that unit in anything but a flat pitch. There was also the issue of him losing the captaincy, the team was in a falloff and he clearly had a bad patch during that time that only really improved when Windies came to India.
 
Last edited:

Top