• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The ATG Teams General arguing/discussing thread

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
Time to get into Asia with Pkaistan XIs:

Tests -
1. H. Muhammad
2. S. Anwar
3. Y. Khan
4. J. Miandad
5. M. Yousuf
6. M. Muhammad ao
7. I. Khan ao c
8. M. Khan wk
9. W. Akram ao
10. W. Younis
11. S. Ajmal

ODIs -
1. S. Anwar
2. F. Zaman
3. B. Azam
4. M. Yousuf
5. I. ul Haq
6. S. Afridi ao
7. M. Rizwan wk
8. I. Khan ao c
9. W. Akram ao
10. W. Younis
11. S. Ajmal
You need Zaheer Abbas in that ODI team. He had an average of 47.62 and a strike rate of 84.80. Those are absolutely insane numbers for someone playing ODIs in the 70s and early 80s (closest to Viv). Miandad perhaps unlucky too.
 

Gob

International Coach
Pakistan I'd go

Anwar
Younis
Miandad
Yousuf
Inzamam
Imran
Rizwan
Wasim
Saqlain
Waqar
Shoaib
 

Bitmap

First Class Debutant
Hanif
Anwar
Younis
Miandad
Inzamam
Mushtaq
Imran(C)
Moin Khan+ (Rizwan pretty close to displacing him)
Wasim
Saqlain
Waqar
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Here are two England XIs, split by WW2:

Hobbs
Sutcliffe
Hammond
Grace*
Ranji
Ames+
Rhodes
Lohmann
Larwood
Verity
Barnes

Tough to leave out FS Jackson, Hendren and Leyland. Likewise, Briggs could slot in at 7 instead of Rhodes and I really wanted to fit in Shrewsbury somehow. Grace at 4 may look odd but opening was less of a specialist position in his day and more the default position for the best batsman which these days is 3/4 so that works out in a way. 5 bowlers seems fitting for an England XI of that era and the bowlers all pick themselves. Blythe unlucky.

Hutton*
Boycott
Barrington
Root
Compton
Knott+
Botham
Statham
Trueman
Laker
Anderson

Maybe Underwood in for Statham. Or indeed Snow or Willis. #5 was the toughest spot again. Tough to leave out May. Dexter and KP unucky too but I had to go for Compton.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Australia:

Trumper
Ponsford
Bradman*
Macartney
Hill
Noble
Gregory
Blackham+
Spofforth
O'Reilly
Grimmett

Jeez, McCabe should really be in there but Macartney and Hill are indispensable. Armstrong unlucky too. Noble and Gregory together is h4x.

Simpson
Hayden
Ponting
Smith
Border*
Miller
Gilchrist+
Lindwall
Warne
Lillee
McGrath

No shortage of big names missing here. Waugh, Chappell, Davidson, Benaud, Healy, Lawry, Morris — might as well make another XI out of them. Also Cummins looks nailed on to make that third seamer spot his own but Lindwall retired as the greatest pacer ever so he still has some catching up to do.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Nah England getting rekt was hilarious.
Australia:

Trumper
Ponsford
Bradman*
Macartney
Hill
Noble
Gregory
Blackham+
Spofforth
O'Reilly
Grimmett

Jeez, McCabe should really be in there but Macartney and Hill are indispensable. Armstrong unlucky too. Noble and Gregory together is h4x.

Simpson
Hayden
Ponting
Smith
Border*
Miller
Gilchrist+
Lindwall
Warne
Lillee
McGrath

No shortage of big names missing here. Waugh, Chappell, Davidson, Benaud, Healy, Lawry, Morris — might as well make another XI out of them. Also Cummins looks nailed on to make that third seamer spot his own but Lindwall retired as the greatest pacer ever so he still has some catching up to do.
Also, Trumble and Turner should be close to the first team. Turned over Gregory especially could work. Giffen and Murdoch skipped my mind too.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
just some lad casually chucking his team to series win and no **** willing to call him out. absolutely bizarre time period.

diabolical cheat
Willis called him out and had the race card played against him. TBH amongst all the scandals such as spot fixing and ball tampering that have come up over the past decade it is unfortunate that Ajmal's being allowed to get away with what he did for so long has been swept under the carpet. It was worse than any of them in how it affected the game at the time.
 

ImpatientLime

International Regular
Nah England getting rekt was hilarious.

Also, Trumble and Turner should be close to the first team. Turned over Gregory especially could work. Giffen and Murdoch skipped my mind too.
was lovely banter but doesn't detract from the fact that the cheat was doing his best jan zelezny impersonation.

swann, panesar and rehman were all ace in that series. guess what? they all bowled and didn't chuck like that cheating wanker.
 

HookShot

U19 Vice-Captain
I actually have that book (back home in Australia, I've not seen it for years!) and have referenced it many times in these chats. The team selected by Derriman was an attempt to statistically choose an all time Australian XI based on by how far players outperformed their contemporaries. Each player was assigned a batting and bowling rating (and all-rounder rating) and the qualifying criteria was 1,000 Test runs or 75 Test wickets.

I am going by memory here (so HookShot can correct me if I get any of this wrong), but Derriman said he based his selection on the old theory that an ideal XI consists of five batsmen (two openers and three middle-order players), five bowlers (two opening bowlers, a first change, and two spinners) and a wicketkeeper and so that is how his team shaped up. He acknowledged that it had a long tail and said that serious consideration was given to including Keith Miller who had the highest all-rounder rating. However, he said that if Miller went in then Lillee had to come out, as both Spofforth and Davo had better bowling ratings. So, as he didn't want to lose Lillee he kept the team as it was. Bradman was named captain, and Miller chosen as 12th man.

There were several other "guest" teams named in addition to the ones noted above by HookShot, and it was interesting that Bradman, O'Reilly and Tallon were the only players who were chosen in every single team.
Yeah, that‘s pretty much it!

Davidson averaged 25 in Tests and 33 in First Class cricket, so he was a handy bat - but he certainly wasn’t number 6 material no matter what theories Derriman comes up with….


’This selection accords with the old theory that an ideal eleven should consist of five batsman, five bowlers and a wicket-keeper. Some might criticise it for having too long a tail, and consideration was certainly given to including Keith Miller……The trouble was that if Miller went in then the bowler who had to come out was Lillee, for both Davidson and Spofforth had better bowling rates than him, and on balance the present composition was judged to be preferable.

In any case, there is another old theory which covers the case: if five batsman cannot get the necessary runs, a sixth is unlikely to make any difference.’



The flaw in the logic of that last sentence is that at least one of the batsman will be out-of-form during the Test match, so you actually need six batsman in the side to stabilise the order and make the necessary runs.

Bowlers don’t get out for a duck and have to leave the field when they are bowling; so even if a bowler is out of form he can still hold up an end and be useful while an inform Dennis Lillee or Davidson gets the wickets.
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
I thought M. Waugh was the 5th bowler.
That’s the genius of this. With Symonds bowling his ten economically, if any of McGrath, Starc, Lee or Warne are struggling, MWaugh and Watto can chip in.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
But when Symonds is bowling and creating the chances he creates, who will be at cover to catch them? Symonds bowling leaves a gaping hole in the quality of the field IMO.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
That’s the genius of this. With Symonds bowling his ten economically, if any of McGrath, Starc, Lee or Warne are struggling, MWaugh and Watto can chip in.
Bracken instead of Lee imo, and I'd open with Watto instead of M Waugh and pick Bevan the ODI genius at 6.
 

bagapath

International Captain
Aussie XI from the past 50 years of players who never make it to the all-time XIs

Slater
Katich
Boon
M Waugh
Walters
M Hussey
Haddin +
Johnson
Harris
McGill
Reid

Can become a no.1 test team, actually
 

jayjay

U19 Cricketer
You need Zaheer Abbas in that ODI team. He had an average of 47.62 and a strike rate of 84.80. Those are absolutely insane numbers for someone playing ODIs in the 70s and early 80s (closest to Viv). Miandad perhaps unlucky too.
Both brilliant but I couldn't have Abbas baove Azam or Miandad was a great fighter, scrapped together ODI runs but not as good as Yusuf or Inzy in the middle order or as good a striker as Afridi at 6 (who is a genuinely great ODI all rounder).
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Both brilliant but I couldn't have Abbas baove Azam or Miandad was a great fighter, scrapped together ODI runs but not as good as Yusuf or Inzy in the middle order or as good a striker as Afridi at 6 (who is a genuinely great ODI all rounder).
Madness. Abbas > all of them in ODIs. But you do you, ofc.
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Aussie XI from the past 50 years of players who never make it to the all-time XIs

Slater
Katich
Boon
M Waugh
Walters
M Hussey
Haddin +
Johnson
Harris
McGill
Reid

Can become a no.1 test team, actually
Hussey makes it to some ATXIs surely. MWaugh definitely does. In fact, he might be CW's favorite Aussie ODI opener.

Gilmour should probably get picked. Hogg for McGill.
 

Top