Did you expect different on a cricket forum?Lol you’re all idiots
Fair comment. I'm an idiot for trying to debate with bigger idiots.Lol you’re all idiots
Aren’t we allFair comment. I'm an idiot for trying to debate with bigger idiots.
We are talking about running towards a cricket ball not a tub of ice cream in your fridgeif i didn't want to concede four runs i would simply get to the ball fast enough that i don't have to risk toe dragging the boundary tbqh
Well humour is subjective, alas just because you are not amused by something doesn't automatically make it dumb. Quite frankly this is xenophobic, bigoted bull**** and you should **** off away from this forum with your drivelRight but you're not really addressing the point at all. Broad is not right in his view of Mankading, is that too difficult to understand?
And sorry but humour doesn't translate well in text, especially tongue in cheek British humour that more often than not is neither tongue in cheek nor humorous. I don't think it's too much to call it out as dumb.
because of your teaching?There's a few CW members here who would fail any basic comprehension test I used to set as a teacher.
It was one of the responses to his tweet, lol.Dismissing an English test opener doesn’t require any skill as well but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be given out.
Does broad agree
Look at this **** trying to steal someones jokeDismissing an English test opener doesn’t require any skill as well but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be given out.
Does broad agree
You approving of dumb opinions doesn't make it any less dumber. And it's a bit rich preaching about drivel with this post.Well humour is subjective, alas just because you are not amused by something doesn't automatically make it dumb. Quite frankly this is xenophobic, bigoted bull**** and you should **** off away from this forum with your drivel
Self-fulfilling logic in sentence one. I know you are but what am I in sentence 2. Truly and utterly odious.You approving of dumb opinions doesn't make it any less dumber. And it's a bit rich preaching about drivel with this post.
It's the internetLook at this **** trying to steal someones joke
I wonder the same. A bit of tinkering for not a lot of benefit. As it stands, at the death of a T20/ODI, we may now have a situation where it doesn't make sense for a tail ender to tee off into the deep, knowing that he potentially isn't getting the other guy on strike...he might be better pushing a single. Which takes a bit away from the theatre. I like it as it stands, that the risk/reward is higher of trying to clear the boundary.Anyway, leaving group hugs to one side for a moment - I never saw any reason for the batsman crossing law and wondered how it originated. But having said that, it is a long standing law and not one that desperately needed changing.