• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Which bowler is most difficult to face in their ideal conditions?

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Ranking the below spinners in the order that are most difficult to face in their prime home conditions:

Derek Underwood in the late 60/70s in England

Abdul Qadir in Pakistan in the 80s

Warne in Australia in the mid-90s

Kumble in India in the 90s

Murali in Sri Lanka in the 2000s

Ashwin in India in the 2010s
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Ranking the below spinners in the order that are most difficult to face in their prime home conditions:

Derek Underwood in the late 60/70s in England

Abdul Qadir in Pakistan in the 80s

Warne in England in the mid-90s

Kumble in India in the 90s

Murali in Sri Lanka in the 2000s

Ashwin in India in the 2010s
ftfy
 

Jack1

International Debutant
Just thought I'd mention if you remove Laker's 19 wickets game he still took 4.14 wickets per game at home averaging 20.28 in 28 matches. Including the 19 wicket game it's 4.66 wpm and 135 wickets @ 18.08 average in 29 matches. Underwood as an example took 145 in 42 matches at 24.24 - that's 3.45 per game. This was just a comparison between Laker and Underwood considering you included Underwood.

Considering Murali has taken 493 wickets in 73 at home - 6.75 wickets per game @ 19.56 I would certainly have to say Murali..I don't think it's close at all to be honest.
 

Migara

International Coach
Ranking the below spinners in the order that are most difficult to face in their prime home conditions:

Derek Underwood in the late 60/70s in England

Abdul Qadir in Pakistan in the 80s

Warne in Australia in the mid-90s

Kumble in India in the 90s

Murali in Sri Lanka in the 2000s

Ashwin in India in the 2010s
Kumble / Chandra / Underwood on a drying pitch would be. All others are playable. Qadir was hammered by Indians. Warne were taken apart by Indians home and away. Murali had some poor matches against Pakistan. Ashwin was damn lucky. But Underwood, Kumble and Chandra due to thepace they bowl gives no reaction time on a pitch with variable bounce.
 

Migara

International Coach
Further players like Murali in their ideal conditions still wear you down and get you with a good ball. The ideal conditions for Murali was a bouncy track with a bit of spin in it. He never gave the helplessness to a batsman that Underwood / Chandra / Kumble had dished out. One pitches on middle and take off. Next pitches little shorter and scoots. Then after a series of balls that just turn few inches, one bites, spins, bounces and takes the shoulder of the bat.

variable lateral spin is always easier to play than variable bounce.
 

Ymaxxx

School Boy/Girl Captain
Further players like Murali in their ideal conditions still wear you down and get you with a good ball. The ideal conditions for Murali was a bouncy track with a bit of spin in it. He never gave the helplessness to a batsman that Underwood / Chandra / Kumble had dished out. One pitches on middle and take off. Next pitches little shorter and scoots. Then after a series of balls that just turn few inches, one bites, spins, bounces and takes the shoulder of the bat.

variable lateral spin is always easier to play than variable bounce.
does murali sleep in boxers or pyjamas
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Hard to argue against Murali but medium slow + variable bounce is generally catastrophic for batsmen too.
 

Top