• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

IMO, Matthew Elliott was the unluckiest of the lost generation of Australian batsmen from the 90s/00s

Moss

International Captain
Have only seen this implied rather than confirmed (Aussie posters would have a better idea), but Elliott was apparently an introverted sort and really didn't buy into the baggy green-worshipping team bonding thing which was the culture cemented by Steve Waugh. Recall reading (don't remember where) that he was pretty much a loner during that 1999 West Indies tour and that plus his lack of runs pretty much sealed the deal as far as Waugh was concerned.

Interestingly when Elliott was brought in to replace Slater in 1996-97, you could have made a case that it was Slater who was extremely unfortunate. He had scored a double century some 2-3 tests prior to that and was widely accepted as one of the best opening bats in the business. He gave his wicket away to David Johnson in the Delhi test and it looked like he was being punished for that.
 

Aritro

International Regular
Wasn't he in terrible form for a good while during that period before the David Johnson dismissal put the camel in a wheelchair?
 

Moss

International Captain
Wasn't he in terrible form for a good while during that period before the David Johnson dismissal put the camel in a wheelchair?
Just did a quick check, and yeah from the 1995 series in the West Indies till the end of the home season his output wasn't great apart from the 219 against Sri Lanka (though I don't know if it qualifies as "terrible form"). But I do recall that the decision to drop him was greeted with a lot of surprise.
 

tony p

State Regular
No, the two unluckiest in the 90's were Jamie Cox & Dene Hills, walk in to the team today.
Cox should have gone on the 1997 Ashes Tour after scoring 1349@67.45 during the 1996/97 home season, compared to Slater who scored 703@37.00 who went as the third opener, behind Taylor & Elliott. Might have got an Australian cap if he had.
Slater only played 5 matches on Tour.

I'm a Tasmanian, and I'm not bitter at all.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Never heard of him. Matthew Elliot played in the 90s right? (I didn't read the thread title). But yeah I just always assumed he was a NZ'lander.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend

@mr_mister could learn a thing or two from this thread
...one of my threads was example you used for the perfect thread title
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Wasn't he in terrible form for a good while during that period before the David Johnson dismissal put the camel in a wheelchair?
He made 90 odd in the 3rd test which they won. Have no idea why that meant he had to be dropped though.
 

Gob

International Coach
Firstclass runs, 7894@40.07 with 21 hundreds, better than most of the recent lot of openers. As a Tasmanian, I say we were hard done by.

As I said, not bitter at all.
That's a good record as per current standards but there were so many with better records at the time
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Wasn't Dene Hills a bit of a double ton specialist? Think he got the most in the shield in the 90s. That's something
 

Top