sledger
Spanish_Vicente
...that the majority of people who have been banned from playing international cricket by the ICC (for corruption) are from the subcontinent?
Serious question.
When you add it all up, a total of 14 players from the subcontinent have been banned by the ICC for being corrupt (5 from India, 7 from Pakistan, 2 from Bangladesh, and 1 from Sri Lanka).
That is more than the combined total of all other nations put together (which is 11).
In other words more than 50% of all corruption related bans have gone to the subcontinent, and the majority of these have gone to two nations specifically. This seems disproportionately high.
Is there some reason which explains why people from these countries appear to be partciularly susceptible to being corrupt?
Serious question.
When you add it all up, a total of 14 players from the subcontinent have been banned by the ICC for being corrupt (5 from India, 7 from Pakistan, 2 from Bangladesh, and 1 from Sri Lanka).
That is more than the combined total of all other nations put together (which is 11).
In other words more than 50% of all corruption related bans have gone to the subcontinent, and the majority of these have gone to two nations specifically. This seems disproportionately high.
Is there some reason which explains why people from these countries appear to be partciularly susceptible to being corrupt?