• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

What to do about tour matches

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Tbf if your pool of talent is so deep that your second XI could comfortably beat a visiting side, then you might as well score psychological points instead of softballing the warmup.
In the case of the NZ your match that was called off, the conditions weren't even that bad. They were just spitting the dummy because a team of Shield rejects was 0-500 against them.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The pitch looked atrocious. It was quite funny though that a porch which saw 0-500 was declared too dangerous to bat on.
 

jimmy101

Cricketer Of The Year
The pitch looked atrocious. It was quite funny though that a porch which saw 0-500 was declared too dangerous to bat on.
I suppose if teams are batting on a porch there's always a danger of a window being broken. Understandable really.
 

cnerd123

likes this
The pitch looked atrocious. It was quite funny though that a porch which saw 0-500 was declared too dangerous to bat on.
I wonder if we had pitches like this back in the old days, which would be lifeless and slow till chunks of it started coming off, leading it to suddenly being unplayable basically overnight. Kinda like subcontinental pitches but more extreme. Would make for some very lopsided scorecards.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Nah it was supposedly because it was "dangerous" for the fast bowlers with the footmarks being a mess. Which was probably largely accurate tbh, but NZ whinged a bit more than was warranted.
 

cnerd123

likes this
The Cricinfo report suggests it was abandoned because a few balls bounced alarmingly towards the end of the first session on Day 2. Apparently McCullum thought it was dangerous already and decided not to bowl the quicks that whole morning as a result.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The only danger posed by that deck was NZ's bowlers catching chronic fatigue syndrome on it.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I really wonder how much some modern players would whinge about some uncovered era pitches? I don't think that anyone up to the seventies would have batted an eyelid at the Johannesburg pitch a few months ago.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The Cricinfo report suggests it was abandoned because a few balls bounced alarmingly towards the end of the first session on Day 2. Apparently McCullum thought it was dangerous already and decided not to bowl the quicks that whole morning as a result.
Possibly being a bit harsh but I got the feeling that a big reason he didn't bowl the quicks was they were already 0-300 and McCullum was spitting the dummy
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I really wonder how much some modern players would whinge about some uncovered era pitches? I don't think that anyone up to the seventies would have batted an eyelid at the Johannesburg pitch a few months ago.
I'd like all the current players whinging about rank turners like nagpur 2015 and pune 2017 to go watch highlights of gavaskars final test innings in 1987. Now that was an unplayable pitch. Makes those other pitches I mentioned seem roads by comparison. There were a few balls bowled by Pakistan's slow left armer (Iqbal Qasim I think) which landed around a good length and almost bounced over the keeper's head.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The pitch looked atrocious. It was quite funny though that a porch which saw 0-500 was declared too dangerous to bat on.
It was declared too dangerous to bowl on. McCullum and Guptill had to send down 21 overs lol.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
My favourite thing about that scorecard (among the many great things about it) is that the partnership was finally broken by Tom Latham who has literally never taken another wicket at first class or list A level.
 

cnerd123

likes this
My favourite thing about that scorecard (among the many great things about it) is that the partnership was finally broken by Tom Latham who has literally never taken another wicket at first class or list A level.
Has he even bowled since then? If not, then when he retires this would be a fine addition to the 'great last balls' thread
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
McCullum just had a sook because his bowlers were getting belted. It set the tone for the whole tour.
 

Flem274*

123/5
125kph long hops both sides of the pitch in brisbane and perth from the half fit wonder duo was too dangerous for my eyes

it was a good reminder to, as stuart broad would say, stay humble and keep working hard for the betterment of our great nation
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
McCullum just had a sook because his bowlers were getting belted. It set the tone for the whole tour.
Pretty much. Unfortunately couldn't use the same excuse in the Tests. If it wasn't for the Day/Night test being on a greentop I doubt NZ would have taken 20 wickets total for the series let alone in a single Test
 

S.Kennedy

International Vice-Captain
Worst thing was the Indians who had a tour match against a fairly good quality Essex side. The Indians refused to play for four days because of ''the heat'' and moaned about the state of the pitch. Essex had to refund about 2,000 tickets. No sympathy then when they got thumped 4-1 off England.
 

Top