This, is just the beauty of sport. I'm sorry, but this was justified. Your enemy won't be able to kill you if you kill yourself first.
I dont know if I should have or not but I genuinely had a good laugh at this
Steve Dennis isn't wrong, is he.
Randiv did something very similar in an ODI once, to deny Sehwag a ton. He denied it being deliberate, but it clearly was.The twoutrage is ridiculous as ever. Nobody died.
Unfortunately the perfectly good words 'average' and 'mediocre' now mean 'bad'.Rob Key contradicting himself on Sky Sports "How average is that? That is appalling".
By definition, if something is average then it certainly isn't appalling.
I'd assumed they meant two runs for the no-ball (though I don't actually know which rules they use) plus four for the boundaryIf there were five runs to win it wouldn't have made any difference to the result but I should point out that according to Law 19.7.1 six runs can only be awarded if the ball has been struck by the bat.
Does the stupid two runs for a no-ball thing extend into club cricket? All the articles/comments seem to specify that the bowler actually threw the ball over the boundary. That's actually quite an impressive effort.I'd assumed they meant two runs for the no-ball (though I don't actually know which rules they use) plus four for the boundary
Sangakkara managed to worm himself free of the controversy and somehow maintained his clean, "classy" image despite him having heard the entire exchange between Dilshan and Randiv and doing zilch to stop it. Complete ****. Have hated the smug arsehole ever since.Randiv did something very similar in an ODI once, to deny Sehwag a ton. He denied it being deliberate, but it clearly was.
EDIT: Already mentioned, my bad.