In reality though the infrastruture in some Test nations Sri Lanka for example wouldn't be that far ahead of Ireland, Kenya and Scotland. I dare say it would similar for West Indies, Bangladesh and Zimbabwe. Financial we don't get much more then associates either, most of money is made by the countries themselves. Obsiously playing Test Cricket and more ODIs helps raise more money.Having said all that considering the gulf in revenue, and consequently infrastruture between the Assoicates and the Test teams how do the ICC expect teams like Ireland, Scotland, Kenya and the like to keep up leave alone catch up with test nations?![]()
Dont Test nations get vastly more from ICC in handouts than Associates? I dont have the numbers off hand but its something like 20 times the amount.Financial we don't get much more then associates either, most of money is made by the countries themselves. .
Figures according to this article on what Kenya gets from the ICCDont Test nations get vastly more from ICC in handouts than Associates? I dont have the numbers off hand but its something like 20 times the amount.
And the steady incomeBoth Kenya and Scotland, who meet on Wednesday, are set to receive US$250,000 from the ICC as their reward for finishing in the top two of the round-robin stage, as well as a place in September's inaugural Twenty20 World Championship in South Africa.
Not exactly rolling in itSince then, they have had to manage on their annual ICC Associate grant of $70,000 and a high-performance grant, earned by a top-six finish in the 2005 ICC Trophy, of $125,000.