*Official* India Tour of Australia 2018/19

[GotSpin]

Tests or ODIs?

Tests

 

[aussie tragic]

Chinese are on the Tendulkar side though.

I'm just glad I'm not banned for claiming half a billion Indians are insane to think Tendulker > Bradman, don't want to challenge the Chinese as well lol

 

[marc71178]

This is not democracy - otherwise Narendra Modi or Donald Trump could be voted as the best cricketer.

But put it another way (scaling down for CW purposes) - if 20 people think a poster is a prick and 5 don't, it's clear that that poster is a prick.

 

[h_hurricane]

I'm just glad I'm not banned for claiming half a billion Indians are insane to think Tendulker > Bradman, don't want to challenge the Chinese as well lol

I am struggling to find any one though(in my friend circle, my school days when Tendulkar was at his peak or this forum) who thinks Tendulkar was better than Bradman. May be there are surprises.

 

[GotSpin]

I am struggling to find any one though(in my friend circle, my school days when Tendulkar was at his peak or this forum) who thinks Tendulkar was better than Bradman. May be there are surprises.

can we just stop this conversation now.

 

[aussie tragic]

And we say Tendulkar > Bradman and thus it is so. The opinion of 20 million is nothing compared to that of a billion.

I am struggling to find any one though(in my friend circle, my school days when Tendulkar was at his peak or this forum) who thinks Tendulkar was better than Bradman. May be there are surprises.

Ishqiya says hello

 

[h_hurricane]

Ishqiya says hello

I don't think he was serious

 

[h_hurricane]

Tests

If Kohli ends up averaging less than 50 in tests, who would you rate higher? Virat or Sachin ?

 

[aussie tragic]

If Kohli ends up averaging less than 50 in tests, who would you rate higher? Virat or Sachin ?

Viv Richards

 

[h_hurricane]

Viv Richards

He is higher anyway.

 

[GotSpin]

If Kohli ends up averaging less than 50 in tests, who would you rate higher? Virat or Sachin ?

Hard to say really but if Kohli averages less than 50 you’d have to go with Tendulkar I’d say.

Kohli already has weaknesses that Tendulkar never had. It only remains to be seen whether kohli will adequately address them as he gets older or continue to try play the way he does now

 

[aussie tragic]

Hard to say really but if Kohli averages less than 50 you’d have to go with Tendulkar I’d say.

Kohli already has weaknesses that Tendulkar never had. It only remains to be seen whether kohli will adequately address them as he gets older or continue to try play the way he does now

Not hard to say, Viv Richards better than both, he just played on too long (like Ricky Ponting). Viv in his prime batting at 3 was amazing

 

[GotSpin]

Not hard to say, Viv Richards better than both, he just played on too long (like Ricky Ponting). Viv in his prime batting at 3 was amazing

What? The comparison was between kohli and Tendulkar

 

[aussie tragic]

What? The comparison was between kohli and Tendulkar

Yeah just saying neither are worthy of discussion as Viv Richard's > both and Bradman >>>> than all

 

[GotSpin]

Yeah just saying neither are worthy of discussion as Viv Richard's > both and Bradman >>>> than all

So I can’t discuss kohli v Tendulkar because someone is better?

This thread keeps getting weirder

 

[aussie tragic]

So I can’t discuss kohli v Tendulkar because someone is better?

This thread keeps getting weirder

Thank you for agreeing Viv Richard's is better than both Tendulker and Kholi...please let discussions return about who is the 10th best batsman in history

 

[srbhkshk]

Thank you for agreeing Viv Richard's is better than both Tendulker and Kholi...please let discussions return about who is the 10th best batsman in history

Bradman obviously..

what's there to discuss.

 

[TheJediBrah]

Thank you for agreeing Viv Richard's is better than both Tendulker and Kholi...please let discussions return about who is the 10th best batsman in history

Why did you even bring Viv Richards into this? Are you that insecure about people discussing two great Indian players that you have to interject with **** like this?

 

[srbhkshk]

Hard to say really but if Kohli averages less than 50 you’d have to go with Tendulkar I’d say.

Kohli already has weaknesses that Tendulkar never had. It only remains to be seen whether kohli will adequately address them as he gets older or continue to try play the way he does now

I'd rate Tendulkar higher even if Kohli finished with an average more than Tendulkar, Tendulkar's longevity is immense and under-rated, for instance to have a test career as long as Tendulkar, Kohli will have to play till 2035.

 

[Dan]

Obligatory reminder that posters are not their nationality, or extensions of the team that shares that nationality.

So everyone **** off with the.nationalistic warmongering and trolling already.