how come?The Wadsworth/Watling decision was a real tough one for me.
If you prefer Smith, Parore or Blain ahead of Wadsworth then you should try voting for them.I thought I'd contribute to this thread, but when there's serious debate about Wadsworth over Watling it's probably not the place for me. No offence to those making those selections, we all have our reasons. Just not sure what those would be. Where's Smith? Parore? Tony Blain?
What a novel idea!If you prefer Smith, Parore or Blain ahead of Wadsworth then you should try voting for them.
Part of the question was in what world would Ken Wadsworth be ahead of BJ Watling in any classification?If you prefer Smith, Parore or Blain ahead of Wadsworth then you should try voting for them.
Wicketkeeping.Part of the question was in what world would Ken Wadsworth be ahead of BJ Watling in any classification?
Any chance you could follow through on this promise?That's why I said I checked into the thread and wouldn't contribute, I clearly don't get what it's about.
No. Please - elaborate if you could. Is it that you're saying Ken Wadsworth was a better gloveman than BJ Watling, therefore you've picked him in the side? Are you saying therefore Wadsworth is a better gloveman than Smith, Parore etc, who all had better batting averages than Wadsworth too?Wicketkeeping.
Any chance you could follow through on this promise?