OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Also, I know he was a fixer and all, but Azharuddin was better than de Silva anyway.
How so? I don't remember Dravid being anything special in the 00s. He was good yeah but he was more of an emerging player than an established one iircDravid> Inzi in the 90s even though he played fewer matches.
.
It is close. Azhar was better in the 80s; but De Silva was better in the 90s imo.Also, I know he was a fixer and all, but Azharuddin was better than de Silva anyway.
Inzi wasn't either. Dravid had some very good tours to Eng, NZ and SA. Didn't mean to say he was anywhere close to Waugh, Sachin and Lara, obviously.How so? I don't remember Dravid being anything special in the 00s. He was good yeah but he was more of an emerging player than an established one iirc
By the end of the 00s Inzy was definitely the main batsman in the Pak middle order of Ijaz Ahmed, Salim Malik, (a young yousuf) and rated on par or better than Anwar (throwing this out with memory but I think I am right).Inzi wasn't either. Dravid had some very good tours to Eng, NZ and SA. Didn't mean to say he was anywhere close to Waugh, Sachin and Lara, obviously.
Hmmm. I actually had to go to stats guru to look it up. You're right. Inzy averages only 43 for the 90sWhat does the batting relative batting strengths of India and Pakistan have to do with anything?
Ftr, Inzi played 60 matches in the 90s and scored a grand total of 8 tons. Dravid scored 6 hundreds in 34 matches, averaged a lot more, and had some amazing overseas tours (bar Australia in 99-00) all adding up to an overseas average of 60. It's pretty clear Inzi wasn't that good in that period. Inzi only really hit his stride in early 2000.