Know what you mean. No glaring weakness, no obvious strength, plenty of depth.I think England are the team that would probably benefit from this least.
Not that we'd get worse by making trades, we just wouldn't get any better.
See what you did there.Being English, I wouldnt trade for anyone as all players should be domestically born and bred.
Nothing for the Windies there, they have Benn and Bishoo and Ohja's not going to give them much more than Nikita Miller. Ojha for Siddle/Hilf?Ojha for Andre Russell.
I would gladly take Siddle/Hilf for Ojha, but doubt any Aussies would be up for that.Nothing for the Windies there, they have Benn and Bishoo and Ohja's not going to give them much more than Nikita Miller. Ojha for Siddle/Hilf?
I would gladly accept any players youd love to get rid off to build our best national team ever
Any left-over, out-of-form, too-fat, catch-phobic cricketers welcome, thank you. But Im gonna need somebody whos really bad but is sort of classy bad and is known and respected for his unskilled play to be our skipper...
Can't see how an Indian could refuse given their batting depth. In limited overs cricket it'd be no contest.
Would trade Gambhir (even though I hate him) for Gul. Decent trade and they are about the same age. India needs a good fast bowler to bowl alongside with Zak and we need a solid one down/opener. Would Indian fans agree with this trade?
Would probably strengthen both teams I reckon. We badly need a quick with that sort of quality and pace while you guys need a good spinner.Would take that Himannv.
If I was Indian I would probably take that.
Would trade Gambhir (even though I hate him) for Gul. Decent trade and they are about the same age. India needs a good fast bowler to bowl alongside with Zak and we need a solid one down/opener. Would Indian fans agree with this trade?