|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 991
|
Worlds greatest team
How would you go about deciding which team is the greatest from the start of cricket. Would you look at total win/loss ratio, winning the most ICC events, years at the top of the rankings or something else. Would you combine tests and ODI's or have them seperate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Eternal Optimist
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shake my tree where's the apple for me?
Posts: 43,622
|
The team with the most world-class all-rounders in, the England 09 Ashes team takes it with five (Flintoff, Collingwood, Broad, Swann, Anderson)
__________________
Watch out, for as soon as it pleases them they’ll send you out to protect their gold in wars whose weapons, rapidly developed by servile scientists, will become more and more deadly until they can with a flick of the finger tear a million of you to pieces RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Eternal Optimist
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shake my tree where's the apple for me?
Posts: 43,622
|
Yeah obviously I was (semi) joking but look at the players that would be considered in all-time XI or squad and that's another way. The Aussie team of the 00s has to be up there on that basis, sadly
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 991
|
I thinking more of a ranking for all time, Aus would be an obvious candidate for top and Bangers on the bottom but how would you fill the rest, or all if you rank Aus and Bangers different.
I really couldent separate WI, Pak and Ind for overall lifetime ranking, NZ and SL are very close also IMO. I'm leaning towards SA as number two but it gets fuzzy after that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
International Captain
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London
Posts: 7,020
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Cricketer Of The Year
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: chez les Ashes
Posts: 8,730
|
Quote:
And the great teams are pretty easy to identify. Since WW2 there have been three: the Crimvincibles, the Windies from the late 70s to the early 90s, and the Aussies since about from the early 90s to the late Noughties. And maybe I'd add England in the mid-50s as well, and the SA side from the 1970s would have been great had it not been for apartheid. In the ODI era, the great Test teams have also been the best in the world at ODI cricket but for me this merely underlines their achievement in Tests. If a team came along which was a great Test side but a poor ODI side, to me they'd be a great side. The reverse however would definitely not be true. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
International Debutant
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: India
Posts: 2,102
|
What are we talking about here? Is this the best performing team through its entire history. That would clearly be Australia which has had a close to top class team pretty much all the time except for a few years in the 80's. If we are talking about the best team at a given point of time I would say it's the Windies team which beat Australia in 1980. Australia had a near-great team and yet the Windies destroyed them in two consecutive tests on their home grounds. It was just a marvellous all-round performance where practically everyone contributed. I would back that team against any other in cricket history. The Australian team of the 2000's was up there but I think their two defeats in India and England puts them down a couple of notches.
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| is anyone there onwer of dadas team of Omar Dada | omardada | Fantasy Cricket | 1 | 12-06-2009 05:34 AM |
| Battrick Team Details | superkingdave | Battrick | 72 | 04-08-2007 02:40 AM |
| Relegation/promotion release | NZTailender | World Club Cricket | 12 | 30-11-2006 10:33 PM |