|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,823
|
Saffers in English cricket
Jonathan Trott's successful debut now makes it four Englishmen who were born in South Africa who have now cemented their place in the English Test team, the others being Andrew Strauss, Kevin Pietersen and Matthew Prior....
And there are quite a few others making runs in county cricket. Who knows, in a couple of years' time, we could see an England side playing the next Ashes series with a batting lineup that looks like this: 1) Andrew Strauss 2) Stephen Moore 3) Michael Lumb 4) Kevin Pietersen 5) Jacques Rudolph 6) Jonathan Trott 7) Matthew Prior Given the influx of Saffer cricketers to England over the past decade, this is quite a real possibility. I guess English cricket has a lot to thank the end of apartheid for!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Eternal Optimist
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shake my tree where's the apple for me?
Posts: 43,598
|
I think it's important, though, to distinguish between Strauss & Prior, and Pietersen and Trott. Strauss and Prior are products of English cricket, and have been over here since their youth, and I think have English parents as well.
__________________
Watch out, for as soon as it pleases them they’ll send you out to protect their gold in wars whose weapons, rapidly developed by servile scientists, will become more and more deadly until they can with a flick of the finger tear a million of you to pieces RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Englishman
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Doing the stance
Posts: 42,614
|
To be fair, South Africans were coming over long before the end of Apartheid. Think D'Oliveira was the first to make our test team and was followed by Tony Greig, Ian Greig, Allan Lamb, Chris Smith, Robin Smith, Neal Radford, KP & Trott. Strauss & Prior are slightly different in that they came to the UK as children with their families.
Fair play to them, I say. If a player is available for selection and is the best man for the job we'd be shooting ourselves in the foot to ignore them based on birthplace or upbringing.
__________________
- As featured in The Independent. "This is not the time for namby-pamby promising youngsters who might just do something; not the time for building for the future. Pragmatism rules and they don't come more pragmatic than Rogers." - Victor Marks makes the case for stiff-legged and stiff-armed 35 year old left-handers in Ashes squads |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
International Coach
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Above you
Posts: 13,910
|
Made a similar point to PEWS on msn earlier this evening itbt. Trying to name an English qualified, Saffa born XI.
You should see the XI you could make out of Kolpaks though, it's ridiculous. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
International Coach
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Above you
Posts: 13,910
|
Quote:
1. Boeta Dippenaar (10,695 runs @ 41.45) 2. Jacques Rudolph (10,931 runs @ 44.43; 58 wickets @ 41.51) 3. Martin van Jaarsveld (15,021 runs @ 45.38) 4. Kevin Pietersen (11,026 runs @ 50.81; 61 wickets @ 52.93) 5. Dale Benkenstein (12,486 runs @ 46.07; 87 wickets @ 36.11) 6. Jonathan Trott (8,204 runs @ 43.87; 50 wickets @ 45.68) 7. Nic Pothas (10,354 runs @ 41.91; 597 dismissals) 8. Andrew Hall (6,210 runs @ 34.69; 492 wickets @ 25.71) 9. Nicky Boje (8,244 runs @ 34.32; 545 wickets @ 32.17) 10. Ryan McLaren (2,533 runs @ 27.23; 248 wickets @ 24.78) 11. Johan van der Wath (2696 runs @ 24.96; 281 wickets @ 25.88) 12. Justin Kemp (5,871 runs @ 35.36; 192 wickets @ 27.08) That's a ridiculous team. It'd beat most Test teams in the world IMO, and it has the best "tail" of all time. It's a wonder South Africa are any good at all having lost all that quality.. and it doesn't even take players like Strauss and Prior into consideration. Though Mclaren is going back to SA so Nel could come in for him. Stolen from elsewhere. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Hall of Fame Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: .
Posts: 16,321
|
Over half of that squad still play cricket in South Africa and none of them were disowned. They all had international/domestic contracts prior to leaving and most of them still do.
And it isn't like South African didn't get good value out of them. How many opportunities did Rudolph, van Jaarsveld and Human get to consolidate their national positions? And Rudolph is apparently getting another go soon... That side couldn't perform when they had even better cricketers like Pollock, Donald and Kallis playing with them, how could they do it now? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Cricket Spectator
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 36
|
its a bloody joke you should have to play for the country your born in strauss and prior a bit of an exception but peitersen and trott are a joke they represented their country at a junior level so they should have to play for their country
__________________
Demon fast bowler |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Hall of Fame Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mumbai India
Posts: 19,170
|
I think with the world having become as small as it has, worrying about these issues in this time and age is really very surprising.
If this is how we feel in the 21st century, surely those who played Ranji in the 19th were far more enlightened than us. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Cricketer Of The Year
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,912
|
Quote:
Obviously I'm completely in favour of Trott right now, but the prospect of and England side featuring lots of guys who've changed nationaility as a career move doesn't thrill me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
State Vice-Captain
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England (support India)
Posts: 1,404
|
Quote:
I guess the problem is what Atherton mentioned on Sky, international cricket is about testing a one country's domestic cricket system against another's, and with South African trained players playing for England it's not really doing that anymore. Also it's incredibly worrying for England's future that the South African players who couldn't make it in South Africa are being picked or considered for England ahead of English players with alarming regularity. As he said regarding Trott's selection, surely there is a young English batsmen in the counties good enough to be a decent international batsman? Last edited by oitoitoi; 25-08-2009 at 02:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
State Captain
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 1,972
|
I think that Rudolph, van der Wath and Hall are all, along with McLaren returning to SA domestic cricket with the first two available to play for SA again, likewise McLaren if good enough. Kieswetter and Malan look lost to them though. Majola said something about them trying to play their kids young to qualify them to keep them out of the clutches of the rapacious England.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
International Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: england
Posts: 5,638
|
Not really. If the ban hadn't been lifted some of the Pollock's, Kallis's or Donald's of this world might have played for England instead. Having said that I don't agree with non Englishmen playing for England unless they come here as children and were brought up and learned their cricket here. Just conveniently changing nationality for the sake of playing Test cricket with no affinity for the Country shouldn't be allowed.
__________________
Not now Maud, I am sprinkling the man in the tent. |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Non Test Playing Nations (Fresh Thread) | laksh_01 | Cricket Chat | 143 | 05-04-2011 07:05 AM |
| SL Premier League Tournament (Season XIII-XIV) | Mr Mxyzptlk | CW Offseason Club Cricket | 216 | 16-05-2008 06:37 PM |
| CRICKET versus BASEBALL - an interesting 'study' | SJS | Cricket Chat | 2 | 26-09-2007 01:44 AM |
| Which was the best decade of the twentieth century? | cover drive man | Cricket Chat | 81 | 08-07-2007 03:48 AM |