• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia in West Indies Thread

Cloete

International Captain
the pitch seems to be VERY dusty. IMO a good move to play hogg and macgill. hogg got 2-40
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
vandemataram said:
Hmm WI bowling is unimpressive, i think Aussies are going to pile up a big total against such a innocuous attack.
Actually, I thought the West Indian bowling was pretty disciplined. The Aussies just played aggressively. Lawson was quick and aggressive and Collins and Drakes were tight in line and length. Dillon didn't get into rhythm at all though.
 

aussie_beater

State Vice-Captain
There was an interesting comment from Steve Waigh saying that the WI score of 237 is equivalent to 150 in Australia given the size of the grounds et al.
 

Eclipse

International Debutant
Thats pritty acurate I reckon just like a score of 300 in India /subcontenent is about equivelent to 260 in Australia.
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
Who was the genius at the ICC who came up with the stupid rule stating that if a specialist wicket-keeper is injured then he cannot be replaced with a fielder outside the original XI?
 

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
Looks like Drakes is the only bowler who has managed to contain the Aussies as well as take wickets. The Aussies are running away with this game and other than a very impressive Lara miracle(Chanderpaul notwithstanding), I don't see anything(of course there is always a chance of rain) which can prevent an emphatic Aussie victory.
 

PY

International Coach
Again and again, Gilchrist seems to produce.....:!( :!( :!( :!( :!( 68 off 72 balls and a partnership of 85 runs from 12.3 overs. What else can be said?:(
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
West Indies are set to bat for 3 days and rack up 1500/6 dec. runs with Lara scoring 376 and Chanderpaul 377* with Drakes getting 172 off 55 balls with 20 sixes.

B.Lee 35-20-240-0
B.Hogg 60-1-520-1
S.Waugh 31-4-62-2
M.Hayden 19-18-1-3

Match Drawn. MOM:- M.Samuels :lol:
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Another shocker by Asoka DeSilva. As Mikey Holding just said, someone has to look into these decisions by Asoka, the ICC has to look into it. These are some of the worst decisions I have ever seen, and all of them against one team....shocking!

52/1
 

aussie_beater

State Vice-Captain
Mr Mxyzptlk said:
Another shocker by Asoka DeSilva. As Mikey Holding just said, someone has to look into these decisions by Asoka, the ICC has to look into it. These are some of the worst decisions I have ever seen, and all of them against one team....shocking!
I have always thought that Asoka De Silva was no good even as an ordinary umpire, leave alone the elite panel..... ICC should throw him out of umpiring completely.
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
aussie_beater said:
I have always thought that Asoka De Silva was no good even as an ordinary umpire, leave alone the elite panel..... ICC should throw him out of umpiring completely.
He was the only good umpire when England toured Sri Lanka, and he was very impressive then, I haven't seen enough of him lately to judge though.
 

aussie_beater

State Vice-Captain
Rik said:
He was the only good umpire when England toured Sri Lanka, and he was very impressive then, I haven't seen enough of him lately to judge though.
I haven't seen that series between Eng and SL, but I have seen him enough from 1999 or so, to support my opinion of him being a third rate umpire.
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
I think that his (de Silva's) general performance in this game has left an awful lot to be desired.

Anyway, back to the game.....

What a match we've got now. Ganga's performed admirably between lunch and tea. A few rash shots, a couple of lucky escapes but he's not dwelt on any of his mistakes. Every time he's ****ed up, Lara's come down to give him a talking-to.

As far as Lara's concerned, what can I say that hasn'r already been said? Colossal.

I'm looking forward to sometime tomorrow morning (perhaps) with the Windies thinking they want a few more runs, then we could possibly have Chanderpaul and Ridley Jacobs batting together - both with runners.

Hilarity ensues.
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
This one's for Rik:

<Sniff sniff> Hmmm...what's that I'm smelling? Humble pie?

Lara thrives on the challenge. As a captain, against Australia, he's been quite good. Yesterday his bowler management was quite impressive. Today, 101 not out....
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
Mr Mxyzptlk said:
This one's for Rik:

<Sniff sniff> Hmmm...what's that I'm smelling? Humble pie?

Lara thrives on the challenge. As a captain, against Australia, he's been quite good. Yesterday his bowler management was quite impressive. Today, 101 not out....
Nope, don't eat pie.

Hmmmm...good bowler management?

Dillon: 23-1-116-1
Collins: 23-1-96-1
Lawson: 21-0-111-2
Drakes: 26.1-5-93-5
Samuels: 21-6-49-0
Ganga: 1-0-1-0

Somehow I think not. It looks like he's given each bowler about 20 overs regardless of weather they are getting smashed around or not.

I look at the scorecard and see a team totally on top of the bowling. As for the century, I have said many a time it is not his batting that is affected, it is the team which is.
 

Top