Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Powerplays

  1. #1
    International Captain Pup Clarke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    6,067

    Powerplays

    How much impact have the addition of Powerplays had on one day cricket?

    Discuss
    Proud member of the Twenty20 is boring society


    E-Mail - liamhowgate@yahoo.co.uk
    MSN - liamhowgate@hotmail.com

  2. #2
    BARNES OUT dontcloseyoureyes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    WILDCARD, BITCHES
    Posts
    28,398
    Bigger totals.
    The one, the only CW Black
    Code:
    47.3 W Coppinger to Heads 
        Smacked the ball straight into the groin of Iwuajoku who has fallen over, 
        miraculously with the ball still caught in his scrotal area! Out!

  3. #3
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    43,719
    Quote Originally Posted by dontcloseyoureyes View Post
    Bigger totals.
    Haha, indeed.

    I've always wanted to see what a game 50 overs fielding restrictions on a somewhat bowler-friendly pitch would be like. Obviously it'd take the spinners out of the game totally so it couldn't be used on a long-term scale - but I'd like to see it done just once.
    ~ Cribbertarian ~

    Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since December 2009

  4. #4
    International Captain
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,171
    Quote Originally Posted by dontcloseyoureyes View Post
    Bigger totals.
    Yupo !
    Proud member of Twenty20-Is-Boring Society.
    T2IBS Media relations officer
    T2IBS official face
    R.I..P ........ Fardin Qayuumi
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    Good luck at the hospital.
    Quote Originally Posted by GeraintIsMyHero View Post
    Fraz is always the best option IMO
    frazbest@hotmail.com


  5. #5
    Hall of Fame Member Goughy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    still scratching around in the same old hole
    Posts
    15,173
    They have probably helped with bigger totals but they have made the window for use of a spinner smaller.

    Instead of bringing in greater flexibility and tactics, we see the powerplays been used in virtually the same way every game and the spinners reduced to overs 20-44 (usually).

    They certainly have no achieved what they were intended to do but the big totals are a decent trade off.
    If I only just posted the above post, please wait 5 mins before replying as there is bound to be edits

    West Robham Rabid Wolves Caedere lemma quod eat lemma

    Happy Birthday! (easier than using Birthday threads)

    Email and MSN- Goughy at cricketmail dot net

  6. #6
    International Regular 16 tins of Spam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Your mom's house
    Posts
    3,557
    There should be a coin toss to decide whether the batting or fielding side gets to decide when to use the next Powerplay.

    We should use a different term too. Powerplay is such a wanky American sounding cliche.
    Member of the Newtown Cricket Club since January '06 - "Per commissum ad taberna"
    Honorary Vice-President of the "Twenty20 Is Boring Society"

  7. #7
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    I'll never, ever agree with a Powerplay not chosen by the fielding side, personally.

    I don't, either, think they've made a massive impact on larger totals - used well, they're actually a bigger advantage to the fielding side (relative to the 15-overs-35-overs rule) than the batting.

    Sadly, captains have mostly refused to innovate.

    But yeah - it has, for obvious reasons, taken spinners more out of the game. Still, only the Lankans have ever really had more than 1 quality spinner at the same time, so it doesn't really disadvantage too many fielding sides.
    Last edited by Richard; 19-03-2007 at 07:41 PM.
    RD
    Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
    (Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
    chris.hinton: h
    FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006

  8. #8
    International Regular 16 tins of Spam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Your mom's house
    Posts
    3,557
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    I'll never, ever agree with a Powerplay chosen by the fielding side, personally.
    Did you mean batting?

  9. #9
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401


    A "not" does wonders for a lot of things...

  10. #10
    Global Moderator vic_orthdox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    25,300
    Yeah, making it chosen by the batting side will be just as boring as by the fielding side.

    As noted, it reduces the flexibilty and options for the fielding captain. It's like the "3 out between 15-30 overs" rule that was used in Australia's ODD competition (and still here in Melbourne in our grade competition *sigh*), which really hurts spinners.

  11. #11
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Jack getting in on the old sympathy act here.


  12. #12
    International Regular 16 tins of Spam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Your mom's house
    Posts
    3,557
    Well, unless we just go back to a fixed period of fielding restrictions, what do you propose could be done to make the powerplays interesting?

  13. #13
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Refuse to allow them to be taken in the 11th and\or 16th over?

    Heck, it's better than allowing the batting side to choose.

  14. #14
    Hall of Fame Member Goughy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    still scratching around in the same old hole
    Posts
    15,173
    Quote Originally Posted by 16 tins of Spam View Post
    Well, unless we just go back to a fixed period of fielding restrictions, what do you propose could be done to make the powerplays interesting?
    Limit the number of overs per innings to 20

  15. #15
    International Regular 16 tins of Spam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Your mom's house
    Posts
    3,557
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard View Post
    Refuse to allow them to be taken in the 11th and\or 16th over?
    So what's to stop them being taken in the 12th and 17th then?
    Quote Originally Posted by Goughy View Post
    Limit the number of overs per innings to 20
    Smartarse

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •