• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

15th June - 2nd Semifinal - India vs Bangladesh

Black_Warrior

Cricketer Of The Year
Solid piece this

How Bangladesh came to have a pace-heavy ODI attack | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo

For a long time, you wouldn't have associated Bangladesh with the phrase "strong pace attack". A subcontinent team playing on slow, low surfaces, some of which turned, was never going to be big on fast bowling - and Bangladesh wasn't. Kids growing up in the country in the 1980s and 1990s had few fast bowling heroes.

The change was a long time coming. Mashrafe Mortaza and Chandika Hathurusingha, the captain and coach so vitally responsible for Bangladesh's ODI success in the last two years, were firm believers that an aggressive approach would take them to the next level, and were instrumental in Bangladesh beginning to actively picking more pace bowlers in their attack.

It began in 2015
Like all revolutions, this one too was met with resistance initially. Having mooted the idea of employing a four-pronged pace attacked after a careful study of their resources before the ODI series with India in 2015, Mashrafe and Hathurusingha didn't find too many in the BCB's hierarchy who agreed with them. "Risky" was one of the words floated around strategy meetings at the time.

Mashrafe and Hathurusingha are, however, men of conviction.They had faith in Taskin Ahmed and Rubel Hossain, who had done well in the World Cup. Mashrafe himself was fit. Most noticeable was the trust they had in Mustafizur Rahman, who had until then played a solitary T20 international.

The Mirpur pitch too encouraged them; Gamini Silva, the curator, had left a hint of green on. But despite these arguments in favour of a pace-heavy attack, the decision to go with four fast bowlers in the XI came just a few hours before the first game, and was accompanied by much trepidation.

The attack worked well enough for Bangladesh to clinch their maiden ODI series win over India. Mustafizur took 11 wickets out of the 16 that went to the fast bowlers in those first two games. Rubel, Taskin and Mashrafe served too, but a side strain ruled Taskin out of the third game, which forced the team management to take their foot off the pedal.

Apart from one game against South Africa, Bangladesh used three fast bowlers in each of their other five ODIs in 2015. The next year, that trend continued in all but one of nine ODIs. This year, they finally used a four-pronged pace attack again against New Zealand in Cardiff - almost exactly two years since they last deployed a similar attack. During this time injuries to Taskin, Rubel and Mustafizur prevented Mashrafe and Hathurusingha picking four fast men, though considerations of pitches, conditions and oppositions also played a part.

Now, however, it has finally been established that if the pitch and overhead conditions are right, and their bowlers fit, Bangladesh are quite eager to pick a four-man pace attack. And failing that, picking three is the new normal. This is a far cry from the days of their spin-heavy attacks. Just two times since the 2015 World Cup have Bangladesh not used a three-man pace attack.

Four is an army
In the 2015 World Cup, Rubel took four wickets against England and looked the most impressive bowler in the quarter-final against India. He had had an up-and-down international career till then, and had been more successful in ODIs than in Tests or T20s. Even in ODIs, Rubel's troubles in the slog overs and injuries meant that he wasn't always an automatic choice. But his late movement with the slightly older ball always attracted attention.

Taskin, who had made a barnstorming debut against India in 2014, wasn't hitting his stride. But he had pace and was improving his fitness, and in Mashrafe he had a hero he didn't want to let down.

Seeing Mustafizur in the nets convinced Mashrafe and Hathurusingha that India needed to be tackled with pace. It wasn't just that Mustafizur was dismissing Tamim Iqbal and company, but that he was doing it with something unique. He had developed an offcutter, all on his own, that kicked in front of the batsmen, and, when it took an edge, carried to the wicketkeeper.

Bangladesh have tried others, but generally the team management have gone with Mashrafe, Rubel, Mustafizur and Taskin when fit and when presented with the right conditions.

The enablers
For years Mashrafe and other senior Bangladesh bowlers had argued it is best to use pace in the last ten or 15 overs of an innings. When Mashrafe became captain, this became a guiding principle. An important enabling factor in making Bangladesh evolve from picking eight batsmen in their ODI XI into one that picked four fast bowlers was the all-round skills of Shakib Al Hasan and Mushfiqur Rahim. In those two, Bangladesh have two full batsmen, a front-line bowler and a wicketkeeper. Still, that hasn't always been enough to justify picking four pace bowlers. They needed bowlers who could take wickets.

Mashrafe himself had to work hard to remain fit, but his bowling has improved as he has grown older; he is subtle in his variations and most effective when he can swerve and cut the new ball. His captaincy has ensured that fast bowlers were given a fair run as a collective. When Mashrafe talks, people listen. Hathurusingha, likewise, is inclined to using pace.

A little coaching help
There had been occasions in the past when the need for speed prompted the BCB to hire short- and long-term bowling coaches. Andy Roberts' 2001 stint is usually credited with providing the final push in Mashrafe's elevation into the Bangladesh team. Champaka Ramanayake, Bangladesh's first full-time bowling coach after joining in 2008, is said to have encouraged the selectors to pick a raw Rubel, who reminded him of Lasith Malinga.

Robiul Islam, who had a short stint as the leader of Bangladesh's Test attack, learned to use his first-class experience in Test cricket thanks to Sarwar Imran and Shane Jurgensen. These two fine coaches were also important in Taskin's growth. Jurgensen made sure Taskin played in the 2014 World T20 to get exposure; a couple of months later, he made his sensational ODI debut, with five against India.

Last year the BCB hired Aaqib Javed for a short stint. The bowlers found him to be very well read, and approachable. There remains curiosity about whether Aaqib passed on vital tips on reverse swing, but the bowlers who worked with him were eager for more of what he offered.

When Courtney Walsh joined last year, it was seen as the BCB acknowledging that the team needs a big name to guide them. Walsh agreeing to join was also validation from a legendary fast bowler that this was a pace attack that was challenging enough, with enough potential to work with, for his first international coaching job.

The ones who fell by the wayside
There have been casualties on Bangladesh's road to picking four fast bowlers. Some arrived with big reputations but crumbled in the face of international cricket's relentless pressure, either physically or mentally. There were some whose bodies couldn't handle the day-to-day stresses of bowling for a team that lacked teeth for a long time. A few couldn't handle fame.

Talha Jubair was one of the first whose frail body couldn't take the toll of international cricket. He bowed out early, leaving Tapash Baisya to fend for the team in difficult circumstances. An unheralded pace bowler who had limited skills but a big heart, Baisya fell out of favour as soon as other attractive pace options became available. Syed Rasel didn't last long; Nazmul Hossain succumbed to far too many injuries.

Robiul too couldn't quite replicate his superb Test series against Zimbabwe in 2013, eventually falling out of favour with country, club, and even his division in the first-class competition. Shahadat Hossain served for a while, but he was always seen as someone better suited to Tests (though the numbers don't reflect such a notion).

But in Taskin, Rubel and Musafizur, Bangladesh have an odd combination of bowlers that has clicked.

Taskin is the city boy who became a YouTube sensation even before he played for Bangladesh. Rubel has seen it all, having been on the receiving end when Bangladesh lost the final in his first ODI series, in 2009. His difficulties in Tests, multiple injuries, and a constantly changing action held him back before he came out of his shell in the 2015 World Cup.

Mustafizur too is now realising that the road isn't smooth. Since fully recovering from his shoulder surgery in 2016, he has had good days and bad days. Against New Zealand in Cardiff, his last two spells showed that he was ready to sacrifice his natural ability in order to stop the batsmen from scoring too heavily.

And then, of course, there's Mashrafe, the leader who knows exactly when to praise his charges, and when to deliver a rocket. It is not that he meddles with his young pace attack, but he is close enough to know exactly when to speak to Rubel and Taskin, and when to leave Mustafizur alone to do what he does best.

Mohammad Isam is ESPNcricinfo's Bangladesh correspondent. @isam84
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
Really? Didn't enjoy it at all tbh. Would've much preferred a slightly deeper analysis on to exactly why it's working as opposed to "they're just choosing pace bowlers"
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Alright mate done. thought it was a great reflection of the regional hatred though
Those recent Mauka Mauka ads are so crass and stupid. I remember when they used to be somewhat tongue-in-cheek and funny (well, at least to Indian fans :D).
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
They've gone through a lot of fast bowling coaches - it's interesting how that may have helped accelerate progress getting access to a lot of different ideas and methods, rather than having the one bowling coach for a long period of time because they were successful at the start.
 

AndyZaltzHair

Hall of Fame Member
They've gone through a lot of fast bowling coaches - it's interesting how that may have helped accelerate progress getting access to a lot of different ideas and methods, rather than having the one bowling coach for a long period of time because they were successful at the start.
Surprisingly Heath Streak has been missing in the article. Streak was the main man responsible for all the good works done by pacemen. He used to have plan for each individual bowler, opposition batsman and game situation. That helped BD a lot because BD pacers always need to get told what to do. As Streak left there is a definite decline now.
 

Black_Warrior

Cricketer Of The Year
Surprisingly Heath Streak has been missing in the article. Streak was the main man responsible for all the good works done by pacemen. He used to have plan for each individual bowler, opposition batsman and game situation. That helped BD a lot because BD pacers always need to get told what to do. As Streak left there is a definite decline now.
Also Ian Pont. Guy did a lot of good work with BD bowlers back in the day. Not sure if how these two tenures went with BCB had anything to do with it
 

Black_Warrior

Cricketer Of The Year
Really? Didn't enjoy it at all tbh. Would've much preferred a slightly deeper analysis on to exactly why it's working as opposed to "they're just choosing pace bowlers"
What reasons were you looking for? I thought it talked about each of the 4 men and how they started and how they are where they are now. And that explains how Bangladesh came to have a pace heavy attack
 

cnerd123

likes this
Also I think losing senior spinners like Razzak and Enamul Haq and having a bunch of untested young spinners meant that going spin-heavy like they used to wouldn't be the best strategy. It also frees Shakib up to focus on batting more if BD builds their attack around pace rather than around spin with him in the centre of it.

Just my 2 cents.
 

Black_Warrior

Cricketer Of The Year
Yepp that's certainly part of it. The piece mentioned how Masrafe and Hathurasinghe had to go and convince the board about it and I'm sure the reason they made that move was because they realized that they had better seamers than spinners at their disposal at that time
 

AndyZaltzHair

Hall of Fame Member
Also Ian Pont. Guy did a lot of good work with BD bowlers back in the day. Not sure if how these two tenures went with BCB had anything to do with it
BCB had beef with Ponty but not sure about Streak. Streak leaving the job was a bit of surprise because he was in good terms with bcb from all accounts.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
A Bangladesh win here would be best for everyone tbh. Bangladesh overperform and pat themselves on the back, India don't lose to Pakistan, and Pakistan win a trophy.
 
Last edited:

Top