CATCHES WIN MATCHES
A TOLL IS A TOLL AND A ROLL IS A ROLL,
AND IF WE DON'T GET NO TOLLS, THEN WE DON'T EAT NO ROLLS
Look, I may well be a dick by a number of people's measurements. Fair enough.
But in the instance I tried to get back on track - I receive insults from randoms mid-way through conversations, all on the back of King Burgey implcitely advising his slaveboys to have a pop.
Believe it or not, I came here to talk cricket. If you want to turn it all into a nasty insult-fest, I'm game. I can take it. We can go really nasty!
But that wasn't my reason for logging on here. And I'd prefer it not to head down that route.
And subject to banning, I'm not leaving either
World XI Since 1990 -
1. Gooch 2. Dravid 3. Ponting 4. Tendulkar 5. Lara 6. Kallis 7. Gilchrist 8. Akram 9. Warne 10. Ambrose 11. McGrath
Look, either go all out and turn it into an "insult the hell outta GFL" thread; or talk cricket.
Don't be a pussy and leave it in no-man's land.
I'm happy to talk cricket, and forgive and forget.
If I only just posted the above post, please wait 5 mins before replying as there will be edits
West Robham Rabid Wolves Caedere lemma quod eat lemma
Perhaps dropping it would be a start then?
We've already told everyone to can it once, with two follow up posts regarding exactly what to can. Last warning.
Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since Dec '09
Rejecting 'selection deontology' since Mar '15
'Stats' is not a synonym for 'Career Test Averages'
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Tucker
Anyway - An interesting article on Cricinfo today.
I wasn't aware of the whole psychological angle England were seeking to exploit with Broad. People thriving in a climate of abuse - very interesting stuff.
Broad perhaps isn't typically the guy to maintain form across a whole 5-match series. Perhaps this is a catalyst?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)