hughes and johnson to lead the way - Page 2

Richard · 03-06-2009, 05:16 PM

This thread has virtually nothing to do with Johnson or Hughes and everything to do with some bitter Aussie (or merely some idiot looking for reactions) who was so incensed that England had the nerve to celebrate a magnificent victory in 2005 that every subsequent Australian victory is going to be viewed as some sort of dis-justification of that 2005 England victory.

Noble One · 03-06-2009, 05:24 PM

Luckily the members of this forum weren’t sucked in by the thread opener’s actual intentions. The actual posting afterwards has been of a decent quality discussing the fortunes of Hughes and Johnson.

cowboy up · 03-06-2009, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard

This thread has virtually nothing to do with Johnson or Hughes and everything to do with some bitter Aussie (or merely some idiot looking for reactions) who was so incensed that England had the nerve to celebrate a magnificent victory in 2005 that every subsequent Australian victory is going to be viewed as some sort of dis-justification of that 2005 England victory.

no not really but i see you that you were so incensed by that remark that you had to bite.good one richard is your last name head?

Richard · 04-06-2009, 04:55 AM

I see you're going to last a long time here... (not)... unfortunately recent evidence suggests bans are going to take longer than they should be, but hopefully we'll be rid sooner rather than later.

zaremba · 04-06-2009, 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cowboy up

good one richard is your last name head?

Moderators?

cowboy up · 04-06-2009, 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard

I see you're going to last a long time here... (not)... unfortunately recent evidence suggests bans are going to take longer than they should be, but hopefully we'll be rid sooner rather than later.

thats not nice richard,i was just having a joke.i didnt know you were so sensitive

vic_orthdox · 04-06-2009, 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cowboy up

thats not nice richard,i was just having a joke.i didnt know you were so sensitive

Please stop posting with the sole intention of baiting members.

cowboy up · 04-06-2009, 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vic_orthdox

Please stop posting with the sole intention of baiting members.

i wasnt, i was only stating that that i didnt know that he would take it seriously

vic_orthdox · 04-06-2009, 06:36 AM

Quote:

i see you that you were so incensed by that remark that you had to bite

Quote:

good one richard is your last name head?

No more.

cowboy up · 04-06-2009, 06:45 AM

fair enough like i said no harm intended but richard said the whole thread was only bait,thats not true as you can see im new here and i wanted to see everyones opinion on phil hughes because ive been following him for some time now and have been impressed by his transition into the test side,thats why i posted the tread

Richard · 04-06-2009, 09:15 AM

If you really wanted such a thing, there are about 150 threads on Hughes of late... not surprisingly... and that'd be a good place to start.

The throwing in the line about England not having the open-top bus (not for the first time in your precious few posts) suggests otherwise, frankly.

cowboy up · 04-06-2009, 05:31 PM

yeah im still learning how to work though the site,i went to ashes 2009 and didnt find any talk on hughes,the bit about the bus was cheeky i admit but its all said in fun and it does only come around every 2 years the ashes.anyway richard off this stupit topic and back on hughes,what do you think off him,will he have success in the ashes and do you think he has a future in the test team?

Richard · 05-06-2009, 11:49 AM

To suggest Hughes is unlikely to have a Test future would be to make a suggestion that all evidence points in the other direction of; and I think he's much more likely than not to have Ashes success.

But anyone can have a bad series, any time.

zaremba · 06-06-2009, 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard

To suggest Hughes is unlikely to have a Test future would be to make a suggestion that all evidence points in the other direction of

No. Just no. If you edit this sentence into English then I will delete this post to remove all evidence that you ever wrote it in the first place.

Richard · 06-06-2009, 05:09 PM

Too late to edit TBH but it does make sense even if it's rather non-sequiteurial (think that's spelt right but there may be no u).

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
2009 Sides vs 2005 Sides	superkingdave	Ashes 2009	77	07-07-2009 05:29 PM

03-06-2009, 05:24 PM	#17 (permalink)
Noble One International Vice-Captain Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 4,112	Luckily the members of this forum weren’t sucked in by the thread opener’s actual intentions. The actual posting afterwards has been of a decent quality discussing the fortunes of Hughes and Johnson.

04-06-2009, 04:55 AM	#19 (permalink)
Richard Cricket Web Staff Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: 2005 Posts: 80,407	I see you're going to last a long time here... (not)... unfortunately recent evidence suggests bans are going to take longer than they should be, but hopefully we'll be rid sooner rather than later.

04-06-2009, 06:45 AM	#25 (permalink)
cowboy up Banned Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: gold coast australia Posts: 72	fair enough like i said no harm intended but richard said the whole thread was only bait,thats not true as you can see im new here and i wanted to see everyones opinion on phil hughes because ive been following him for some time now and have been impressed by his transition into the test side,thats why i posted the tread

04-06-2009, 09:15 AM	#26 (permalink)
Richard Cricket Web Staff Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: 2005 Posts: 80,407	If you really wanted such a thing, there are about 150 threads on Hughes of late... not surprisingly... and that'd be a good place to start. The throwing in the line about England not having the open-top bus (not for the first time in your precious few posts) suggests otherwise, frankly.

04-06-2009, 05:31 PM	#27 (permalink)
cowboy up Banned Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: gold coast australia Posts: 72	yeah im still learning how to work though the site,i went to ashes 2009 and didnt find any talk on hughes,the bit about the bus was cheeky i admit but its all said in fun and it does only come around every 2 years the ashes.anyway richard off this stupit topic and back on hughes,what do you think off him,will he have success in the ashes and do you think he has a future in the test team?

05-06-2009, 11:49 AM	#28 (permalink)
Richard Cricket Web Staff Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: 2005 Posts: 80,407	To suggest Hughes is unlikely to have a Test future would be to make a suggestion that all evidence points in the other direction of; and I think he's much more likely than not to have Ashes success. But anyone can have a bad series, any time.

06-06-2009, 05:09 PM	#30 (permalink)
Richard Cricket Web Staff Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: 2005 Posts: 80,407	Too late to edit TBH but it does make sense even if it's rather non-sequiteurial (think that's spelt right but there may be no u).

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)