280 vs Holland
338 vs India
324 vs Ireland
![]()
280 vs Holland
338 vs India
324 vs Ireland
![]()
They have the worst out of the test playing nations, though I don't rate Bangladesh, India or Pakistan very high either.
You don't rate Pakistan bowling high?![]()
Not the worst, but very one dimensional for the conditions in sub-continent!!! They need to have Swann take a 4-fer almost every game to do well in WC....But thats not easy, if u r not Afridi(j/K)
Twitter @3Bouncers
One of my friends said "And it’s not like we haven’t defeated India enough. I think we’ve beaten them on a couple of occasions, on a lot of occasions, in fact."
Two high-scoring games in a row makes me think that maybe it's because the Bangalore pitch is extremely flat. Or it probably eases out considerably under lights.
280 V Bangas
338 V England
No![]()
I'm just saying
RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.
India's is worse.
WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
"People make me happy.. not places.. people"
"When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life." - Samuel Johnson
"Oh my God, there's a castle! A castle!"
But it's s very close run thing.
Nope, India's is defo. worse. In the beginning of the WC, I'd have rated the English attack near the top tbh. In Broad and Swann they have two of the best LO bowlers in the world.
Anderson in current form is actually a negative though, really realy have to drop him IMO.
Arguing between England and India's bowling line-ups right now would be like arguing who is worse, Benchmark or Burgey. They're both so rubbish its not worth debating.
Ha Ha. I thought none could beat us in this, but England have trumped them no doubt. We will get a clearer idea after this Sunday but I do not think we will do as badly as England.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)