No, because South Africa were the better side in a certain world cup, yet they lost to Australia. That's part of the game. India are better than South Africa because they were better that day. It's really that simple.
He has school so missed the game... he's going to watch the tape of it.Oh so thats whats happened to him ? I was wondering why he is nowhere around
Indeed. In fact you can argue that every single world cup from 1983 to 1999 was one by a team which wasn't the best in the world.
fair enough thanx for sharing but i don't think wasim meant what u r stating up there... he just said that shoaib should play and he (wasim) has been in fights and arguments between his teamates in the past,...
and u call urself neutral guy lol fair enough
Why not. I can keep my name anything. Team india is the one i support. How does name has got to do anything with what team u support.
dude u r contridicting urself here... i support pak and SL.. i don't call my self neutral while u support india and be baise about it and then call ur self neutral... i don't have any problem with u but it seams pretty wrong... it is ur name u can put it anything that u want... why would i have problem with it
get over it buddy. I like my name and pretty happy about it.I know you are frustrated and have dont have anything else to say because pakistan lost.
From an actual neutral point of view, you were dead even for mine.
Er....most people would agree I think. If you believe India were easily the better team today you are indeed far from 'neutralguy'.I guess the grapes are still sour after australia's loss.
That's a strawman argument. You added the word 'easily' where neutralguy had not used that word.
Yeah, this is what I meant. Even if Pakistan had won off that Misbah shot, it was still a dead even game for mine. As you said, winning a game doesn't automatically accord one better status.
