and a wicket keeper, a better onekendall said:All India need is a better pace atack and then they have a superb team. Too atack that batting line up is simply obsurd
exactly how do you class a side mediocre? just becasue a side isnt the best in the world doesnt make them mediocresledger said:if india are mediocre then yes the only team that are better than mediocre is australia, if india are mediocre that must mean everyone else excluding the aussies are either mediocre or poor.....or zimbabwe....
yes it is a silly theory really, india bar one or two players are an excellent side.kendall said:exactly how do you class a side mediocre? just becasue a side isnt the best in the world doesnt make them mediocre
It doesn't support the fact the batting today was dismal, soul-less.Duncan said:Guys,
Stop whinning, it's pathetic. Pakistan outplayed India, and was on top this whole test. India lost because of some good cricket from Pakistan, not bad cricket from it's own players.
Same scenario as the last day of test 2 where Pakistan had to play out time to draw the match. But then I guess we can conclude that both teams are mediocre going by what you've said.Sudeep said:It doesn't support the fact the batting today was dismal, soul-less.
If you read the first page, I've defended India, as not being mediocre.Unattainableguy said:Same scenario as the last day of test 2 where Pakistan had to play out time to draw the match. But then I guess we can conclude that both teams are mediocre going by what you've said.
I agree with you fully mate.Indian bowling truck load of rubbish.Pathan is hyped up guy. he might become another zaheer khan sooner or leter.tooextracool said:i doubt it, the pakistan batting was made to look exceptional by some rubbish bowling by india. certainly any team that lets pakistan score 261 from 50 overs in the 3rd inning of a test match must be poor, let alone any side that lets afridi score like the way he did. there isnt much getting away for it, india's bowling is extremely extremely poor, their batting well relied pretty much on sehwag and dravid. dravid had one mediocre test and they lost.
for me i really wonder how long they are going to go along with this pathan is the next wasim rubbish, you cant expect to be playing 20 tests with such awful performances. balaji isnt much better.
To top it all, the indians have been figuring how to play afridi for last 9 years and still they do not have the answers.shame on them.One just has to only look at afridis bowling against india in test matches.These guys are clueless against him, including the famed batting line up.vvk said:Afridi, a part-timer, was made to look like a world beater today.
Then what's your point? The comment wasn't directed at you, it was at the whinners who are calling India mediocre and that the reason India lost was because they played badly.Sudeep said:If you read the first page, I've defended India, as not being mediocre.
And while we are at it, our batting line-up is much better than Pakistan's. So you except us to survive more than them.
Simplifying your rotund vocabulary, there is a simple word for this whole sentence-"mediocrity".Duncan said:BTW, the notion that India was so superior to Pakistan has gone down the toilet. It's only paper. Maybe in ODIs the better side can lose, but in a Test series, when you are overall outplayed... it means you are not so superior.
agreed, which is the be all and end all of this matter imo, although india lost because of a combination of bad cricket from its players and good from pakistan, this defeat was partly self induced.Duncan said:Guys,
Stop whinning, it's pathetic. Pakistan outplayed India, and was on top this whole test. India lost because of some good cricket from Pakistan, not bad cricket from it's own players.
neutralguy said:Simplifying your rotund vocabulary, there is a simple word for this whole sentence-"mediocrity".
I do not care whether you need my english expertise or not, but it would be good if you simplify your complicated vocab...chillDuncan said:
I'll ask if I need your English expertise.
I was arguing your point of India losing because of Pakistan's improved play. Whereas, the fact is we played poorly yesterday. I'm not saying we're mediocre, but yes, we did play miserably yesterday.Duncan said:Then what's your point? The comment wasn't directed at you, it was at the whinners who are calling India mediocre and that the reason India lost was because they played badly.
Who is whining? And yes, India lost this match more than Pakistan won it and it is a fact.Duncan said:Guys,
Stop whinning, it's pathetic. Pakistan outplayed India, and was on top this whole test. India lost because of some good cricket from Pakistan, not bad cricket from it's own players.