Shane Warne
Banned
Will they ever reach the standard that the other relative newcomers, Sri Lanka have attained?
Monty said:i think ireland will be better than india
I think USA will be better than Australia by 2006.Monty said:i think ireland will be better than india
Do you think that would be more a case of someone underestimating them, or a true reflection of the improvement they have made (in conjunction with the continuing collapse of, say, the West Indies)?SquidAU said:There is no doubt in my convict mind that the Banglas can actually go and win a Test series within 5 years that won't be against Zimbabwe.
Sure. Windies and Sri Lanka should be within their grasp, or a particularly injury-ravaged NZ touring side.SquidAU said:There is no doubt in my convict mind that the Banglas can actually go and win a Test series within 5 years that won't be against Zimbabwe.
If you're up against India and Sri Lanka, there's little need to worry about pace.Samuel_Vimes said:100 million people - most of whom are cricket-mad, I believe. That's one large talent pool. Coaching and cricket infrastructure is only getting better. Wouldn't be all too surprised if they qualified for the super eights at the WC, actually - competition is an Indian side who they've beaten before and Sri Lanka, who are notoriously poor tourists. Only problem is that their top-order needs to be able to handle true pace...
20 yearskwek said:True, haha.
could someone how long it took India to win a test series ?
Sri lanka is already in the hunt for the first place in odis.Jamee999 said:They will never be Number 1 in the World.
But a Sri Lanka, yeah.
there you go, theres my answer.luckyeddie said:20 years
There's Malinga and Chaminda Vaas, they bowl at a pretty good pace AFAIK.Steulen said:If you're up against India and Sri Lanka, there's little need to worry about pace.