subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Assuming for SENA you have three pacers and one spinner, and for SC you have two pacers and two spinners.
Actually probably Hadlee over Imran in SENA.McGrath/Marshall/Imran/O'Reilly
McGrath/Imran/Murali/mandatory Jadeja slot.
So basically no reverse swinger. Why both Murali and Warne given their India records?If I'm not factoring in batting/captaincy and just looking at bowling:
SENA: McGrath, Marshall, Hadlee, Warne.
SC: Same except Murali in for Hadlee.
Why Jadeja over Ashwin?McGrath/Marshall/Imran/O'Reilly
McGrath/Imran/Murali/mandatory Jadeja slot.
Why Jadeja over Ashwin?
People do seem to have a hard time grasping this concept.lol at McGrath in SC. SC is not just India.
SC - Steyn, Murali, Marshall, Ashwin
SENA - Hadlee, Marshall, McGrath, Warne
I love O’Reilly as much as the next guy but putting him in for an ATG SC side when he never played there feels off. Same thing with Bradman. Ofc I’m sure both would’ve performed great but its like picking someone who never played tests as part of your ATG test XI.SENA- Barnes, Marshall, McGrath, O’Reilly
SC- Steyn, McGrath, Murali, O’Reilly
As well as Pollock and Walsh.Will take Steyn, Imran, Wasim and Marshall over McGrath in Asia.
Their records in India has less to do with not being able to bowl in India and more with regards to facing the Indian's which Ashwin didn't have to do.So basically no reverse swinger. Why both Murali and Warne given their India records?