Why is that?If he'd been born decades earlier and played in Perth before they realigned the square in the eighties he'd have been brilliant there and in England and rubbish everywhere else like Alderman (though some might argue he's not far off that anyway). Currently, he'd have to have changed states.
What is this unfounded accusation?!?Somethin genuinely interesting to me in an Anderson troll thread![]()
The original alignment of the WACA square was more SW-NE, by about 15 degrees. This meant that the sea breeze blew more down the pitch, which meant both that the outswinger went more than afterwards and good bowlers could swing in as well. There were plenty of bowlers of less than threatening pace (Strauss, Brayshaw, Massie, MacLeay) who learnt to bowl into the breeze there, but they weren't as good away. Anderson could have developed more or less the same style in those conditions.Why is that? Post 1985 alignment the fremantle doctor came from mid-on (assume RHB) at one end (assists right arm outswing). If I'm correct, I've never been to Perth. What was the pre-1985 alignment? How did it shape Alderman? Somethin genuinely interesting to me in an Anderson troll thread
You took great pains? It's painfully clear that this is (yet another) painful troll. Enough said. Give it a rest.I even took great pains to indicate that this was not in fact a troll thread.
Yeah because Australians moving to South Africa happens all the timeWould have moved to South Africa and therefore, played for England and had the exact same career he has had now.![]()
Thanks for your contributionYou took great pains? It's painfully clear that this is (yet another) painful troll. Enough said. Give it a rest.
Forecast? Cloudy.Petition to create a James Anderson subforum.
This is now officially a troll thread.Forecast? Cloudy.