• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Time machine thread - Putting players in different eras

karan_fromthestands

State Captain
If there was some kind of simulation to see Bradman vs Murali, it would be epic. Would've said Ambrose vs Bradman but then I wouldn't want to witness murder.
 

Coronis

Cricketer Of The Year
6 months of adapting to T20 in modern circa and the below Team should be awesome

Trumper
Sobers
Bradman*
Hammond
Richards
Walcott+
Miller
Lindwall
Garner
O’Reilly
Barnes
Eh Hammond was a relatively slow batter but yeah big guy - could probably get used to a faster pace. Think he had some aggressive tons.
 

karan_fromthestands

State Captain
6 months of adapting to T20 in modern circa and the below Team should be awesome

Trumper
Sobers
Bradman*
Hammond
Richards
Walcott+
Miller
Lindwall
Garner
O’Reilly
Barnes
Garner and Richards had a style that was anyways T20 oriented. Sobers too a good shout as he had so much to offer even if you take away his batting skilsl. Not sure about the rest.
 
Last edited:
Eh Hammond was a relatively slow batter but yeah big guy - could probably get used to a faster pace. Think he had some aggressive tons.
For a guy like Hammond who was 6 ft 2, strong guy with the perhaps best pyshique in cricket history,it should definitely be a walk in park to adapt in T20.
These bigger bats which goes for six despite edge plus bowl few overs if needed.

Would pay large sum of money to see Hammond. Though none compares to the sight of seeing Trumper.
 
Last edited:

karan_fromthestands

State Captain
karan trying hard to get attention here.
The thread talks about sending players to other eras using a "Time Machine". Definitely believe this version of Warner may have a hard time in the 80s(just like all the other batters from other eras) and would tear apart the line-ups of the 30s/40s. What's wrong with that?

So the idea of a defensive player from 80-90 years back being a T20 GOAT seems OK to you but Warner going back and wrecking bowlers of a different era is hard to digest?
 
Last edited:

Top