Yeah but the information about SL-Ind pitch that its going to be batting friendly gave some advantages to the bookies before play. You can predict its going to be batting friendly but not to the extent of SL-Aus match.No. Arguably it's something between spot fixing and match fixing -- it's not fixing an isolated incident with no broader ramifications, like the Amir no balls, and nor is it fixing the result of the match, like with Cronje etc. But if the curator is being paid off to intentionally create a minefield or road, for the purpose of gambling on the length of the match, it is some form of fixing/corruption.
I mean, you don't need the groundsmen in your pocket to make big coin by backing a Test involving Australia in the Subcontinent to be over early, but still.
Yea I'm definitely not convinced by these guys saying they know if the session will be low scoring or high scoring because they have fixed it with the groundsman or know the players.At best these guys are pretending they are in touch with the players to get all those bets.
Australia is in the subcontinent now?Team from subcontinent in cheating shocker.
And the one before it at Leeds too.Someone will be suggesting that the Old Trafford pitch in 1956 was doctored next
Only when we are being cheated.Australia is in the subcontinent now?
Pauline Hanson got into sledger's accountAustralia is in the subcontinent now?
read it in trump's voicefake news.