Unattainableguy said:Pakistan at full strength with their bowlers Shabbir, Shoaib, and Gul back.
always back the underdog maybe, back pakistan at full strength? woah dont push the boat out to far.Unattainableguy said:Pakistan at full strength with their bowlers Shabbir, Shoaib, and Gul back.
Unattainableguy said:Pakistan at full strength with their bowlers Shabbir, Shoaib, and Gul back.
silly? its a tad more than that.Swervy said:dont be silly
i am in a good mood..didnt want to be too harshsledger said:silly? its a tad more than that.
I'm not convinced that England can be placed categorically above India until we've beaten them, which hasn't happened for almost 9 years, even if we are better than the last time we played them. I'd put India & England joint second, followed by SA, SL & Pakistan in a group depending on form, fitness, and where the game was being played.sledger said:tests i would say england, followed by india
but with that you can be going round in circles...wpdavid said:I'm not convinced that England can be placed categorically above India until we've beaten them, which hasn't happened for almost 9 years, even if we are better than the last time we played them. I'd put India & England joint second, followed by SA, SL & Pakistan in a group depending on form, fitness, and where the game was being played.
Oh absolutely (I mean your first point), which is why an exact league table in test cricket is something of a lottery. Thinking about it, perhaps the fact that England have won a couple of series away from home does categorically place them above India, but I just don't think it's as definite as some would have us believe.Swervy said:but with that you can be going round in circles...
Team A beat Team B
Team B beat Team C
Team C beat Team A
Team D beats them all
Team E loses to them all but beats Team D....
This kind of thing happens all the time.
In general England have played to a higher standard more consistantly than India have done over the last 18 months or so....India just arent consistant enough to be considered number two at the moment, and have more question marks around them than England, who look to be the most rounded team other than Australia
i would say based on current form, england are a much better, deeper and more resilient team compared to india...wpdavid said:Oh absolutely (I mean your first point), which is why an exact league table in test cricket is something of a lottery. Thinking about it, perhaps the fact that England have won a couple of series away from home does categorically place them above India, but I just don't think it's as definite as some would have us believe.
Swervy said:dont be silly
You may argue England and India have a better batting than Pakistan, but I'd expect a evenly balanced contest between them. But Pakistan clearly have the superior bowling attack( considering their bowlers come back) than any other team. And when you put bowling and batting performace together of each team, Pakistan do come on top.sledger said:always back the underdog maybe, back pakistan at full strength? woah dont push the boat out to far.
Agreed. But England will still get thrashed by AUS in the Ashes.Slats4ever said:Test Matches: England
One Dayers: New Zealand