• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Test Opening Batters

In Your View - What is the Minimum Acceptable Batting Average for an Opening Batter in Test Cricket?

  • 35 - 38

  • 39 - 42

  • 43 - 46

  • 47 - 50

  • 50+


Results are only viewable after voting.

Ashes81

State Vice-Captain
I think it depends on your nationality.

Opening up in England is a very different beast to say opening in India.

One of our better openers was Mike Atherton yet he only averaged about 37 which wouldn't be good enough in many countries.
 

The_CricketUmpire

U19 Vice-Captain
I think it depends on your nationality.

Opening up in England is a very different beast to say opening in India.

One of our better openers was Mike Atherton yet he only averaged about 37 which wouldn't be good enough in many countries.
Michael Atherton scored a total of 7,728 runs in his career @ 37.69. However in the role as an opening batsman (number 1/number 2 position) he scored 7,476 runs @ 39.14
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
I’m sure you could find a test opener who averaged 30-35 for a while and was better than the alternatives. Sometimes it’s just about doing a job.

If your test team is Ireland or early Bangladesh you’ll take whatever you can get, if they dropped a guy who averages 35 it’d be crazy.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Averaging 38 opening against world class attacks most of the time is just short of world class level. Especially in a place like SA or England. It's not far off what Smith, Cook, Kirsten etc averaged opening at home. You'd expect a player like that to capitalise on easier conditions to get his average over 40 though. Suppose if such a batsman never chanced upon soft runs you could argue he's better than Hayden. ?
 

Coronis

Cricketer Of The Year
I mean it all depends on the strength of the country’s batting at the time, its impossible to just pick a minimum average. For example, Tamim Iqbal averages 39 opening for Bangladesh, but would barely have played for some other teams. Imrul Kayes (24.5) wouldn’t have even been considered for most teams but was the best Bangladesh had available. “Acceptable” is dependant on too many factors without any specific criteria.
 

_00_deathscar

International Regular
Averaging 38 opening against world class attacks most of the time is just short of world class level. Especially in a place like SA or England. It's not far off what Smith, Cook, Kirsten etc averaged opening at home. You'd expect a player like that to capitalise on easier conditions to get his average over 40 though. Suppose if such a batsman never chanced upon soft runs you could argue he's better than Hayden. ?
Trundler in shock "Michael Atherton was just short of world class" admission.

Interestingly, Atherton averaged a fair few points higher at home than he did away from home.

His record from 1990-2000 also isn't all that bad at all, averaging 40.86 opening, and:
32.06 vs Australia (okay not great)
48.66 vs Pakistan
43.83 vs South Africa
33.84 vs Windies (okay not great)


He actually failed to capitalise vs Zimbabwe (37.50 across 4 tests) and Sri Lanka (7.50 but just the solitary test). Never played Bangladesh.

Did very well vs India and NZ
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
Trevor Franklin opened in 21 tests for NZ and only averaged 23, but did an excellent job. His strike rate was extremely slow (only 26.44!), but he had good opening partnerships with John Wright, and saw off the new ball so that Andrew Jones and Martin Crowe had a base to work from.

Franklin was a million times better than most NZ openers who followed him.
 

Ashes81

State Vice-Captain
Trevor Franklin opened in 21 tests for NZ and only averaged 23, but did an excellent job. His strike rate was extremely slow (only 26.44!), but he had good opening partnerships with John Wright, and saw off the new ball so that Andrew Jones and Martin Crowe had a base to work from.

Franklin was a million times better than most NZ openers who followed him.
It's a very valid point about how many balls an opener takes to score his runs.

30 off 70 is often more valuable than 30 at a run a ball.
 

thierry henry

International Coach
Trevor Franklin opened in 21 tests for NZ and only averaged 23, but did an excellent job. His strike rate was extremely slow (only 26.44!), but he had good opening partnerships with John Wright, and saw off the new ball so that Andrew Jones and Martin Crowe had a base to work from.

Franklin was a million times better than most NZ openers who followed him.
I work with Trevor, I’ll tell him you said that
 

Coronis

Cricketer Of The Year
It's a very valid point about how many balls an opener takes to score his runs.

30 off 70 is often more valuable than 30 at a run a ball.
Just for consideration the top 4 openers of all time SR’s were (based on Charles Davis’ stats)

Hobbs 51
Gavaskar 45
Hutton 38
Sutcliffe 37
 

kevinw

State Vice-Captain
In terms of modern openers, Warner's an outlier in terms of general average but then there's a 25 run difference between his home and away averages.

Elgar and Latham are on the next rung but are also flat track bullies (though those 'flat tracks' are anything but in reality).

Karunaratne and Brathwaite are probably at the same level, carrying their teams and have more interesting nuance in home and away records. Brathwaite has pretty much identical records home and away and Karunratne's away record may only be 30 but that will include a lot of unfamilar environments.

Has Rohit Sharma opened throughout his Test career? I'd assume not and his home and away averages are ridiculous far apart (73 vs 31), so despite an average in the mid-40s, I'm less sure about how great an opener I think he is. Testing conditions are probably not his strength.

Otherwise, lots of openers early in their careers to say too much about.
 

Top