• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Steyn. Ambrose. Imran.

Rank them

  • Imran. Steyn. Ambrose.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ambrose. Imran. Steyn.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    24

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Why he is not close?, though his bowling srike rate is lowest ever in test cricket.
He bowled on some landmines, the bowling average in his games is 16.78, the bowlers other than him are averaging 18.15, in Ashes tests his average is 13.01 and the rest of the bowlers are averaging 17.32, probably a great bowler but certainly not close to Barnes.
 

DrWolverine

International Captain
Spofforth. Lohmann. Barnes.

They may have been greats then but they should not even be compared to modern bowers in my opinion.
 

sayon basak

International Coach
He bowled on some landmines, the bowling average in his games is 16.78, the bowlers other than him are averaging 18.15, in Ashes tests his average is 13.01 and the rest of the bowlers are averaging 17.32, probably a great bowler but certainly not close to Barnes.
Yeah, him and Turner are very close; mere checklisting won't say that. Spofforth was seen universally as a better bowler.
 

sayon basak

International Coach
Spofforth. Lohmann. Barnes.

They may have been greats then but they should not even be compared to modern bowers in my opinion.
Do you even realize that Barnes was from a completely different era? Or you just look at their black and white pictures to put them in one group?
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
He bowled on some landmines, the bowling average in his games is 16.78, the bowlers other than him are averaging 18.15, in Ashes tests his average is 13.01 and the rest of the bowlers are averaging 17.32, probably a great bowler but certainly not close to Barnes.
for reference, How much further other ATG bowlers are than their peers

Lohmann: 13.01
Rest: 17.32
Ratio: 1.33

Barnes: 16.43
Rest: 28.19
Ratio: 1.71

Steyn: 22.95
Rest: 34.57
Ratio: 1.50

Lillee: 23.92
Rest: 31.28
Ratio: 1.36

all had good support bowlers
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
From Coronis:

Barnes 16.43
Others in his era
Blythe 18.63
Trumble 18.67
Trumble was having a peak during Barnes's "era" and that era is highlighted because Barnes played 3 games in a timeframe that overlapped with Trumble's career, Trumble's career stats are 21.56 even tho played on even more bowling friendly wickets than Barnes. Blythe is fair but he's not rated as highly because he was average on good batting wickets in Australia. Sensational bowler at home tho.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Trumble was having a peak during Barnes's "era" and that era is highlighted because Barnes played 3 games in a timeframe that overlapped with Trumble's career, Trumble's career stats are 21.56 even tho played on even more bowling friendly wickets than Barnes. Blythe is fair but he's not rated as highly because he was average on good batting wickets in Australia. Sensational bowler at home tho.
I guess it does take some of the luster off from Barnes if there is another exceptionally averaged bowler in that era.
 

Top