Dick Rockett
International Vice-Captain
Last word 

Keep kidding yourself that you usually win Richard. People usually decide that you're an over-opiniated plonker, who finds it necessary to post on every thread regardless of the fact you obviously haven't thought about or know much about most of them, and end up just ignoring youExactly - I usually do and those like yourself who are foolish enough to take me on eventually reach said point-of-no-return.
Might as well give-up before you start next time... I'm not concerned with the loss of 20 posts or so just through lack of argument with you.
Keep kidding yourself that you usually win Richard. People usually decide that you're an over-opiniated plonker, who finds it necessary to post on every thread regardless of the fact you obviously haven't thought about or know much about most of them, and end up just ignoring you
Was it really not obvious to either of you that that post was ironic?Haha, what a knob (not Fiery).
It's not that Richard. The reason people end up insulting you is your reluctance to budge on any opinion once you have decided on one, no matter how blatantly wrong it is, or to accept anyone elses opinions no matter how valid and correct. It's actually a Richard-refusing-to concede-defeat-again-because-he's-too-pig-headed-so-might-as-well-resort-to-insult-throwing...againAnd surprise surprise... we see the losing-the-argument-resort-to-insult-throwing... again...
Too true.It not even that really. I could certainly respect his stubbornness if he wasn't such a dick about it. A little humility, and acknowledging that what he says is only his opinion and not gospel truth, would certainly go a long way.
Mind you, that would make life boring. I love reading his obstinate defences of his ridiculous theories.
No, no! I won't hear it said.....People usually decide that you're an over-opinionated plonker, who finds it necessary to post on every thread regardless of the fact you obviously haven't thought about or know much about most of them, and end up just ignoring you
yes & scring runs vs the top attacks compared to mediocre/average one's seperates the best from the rest. Thats why Astle can't be called a star..That's because it's "top quality bowling" maybe?
Overlooking the fact that I regularly take great care to do so... as has been discussed.It not even that really. I could certainly respect his stubbornness if he wasn't such a dick about it. A little humility, and acknowledging that what he says is only his opinion and not gospel truth, would certainly go a long way.
You're a fine one to talk on that...It's not that Richard. The reason people end up insulting you is your reluctance to budge on any opinion once you have decided on one, no matter how blatantly wrong it is, or to accept anyone elses opinions no matter how valid and correct. It's actually a Richard-refusing-to concede-defeat-again-because-he's-too-pig-headed-so-might-as-well-resort-to-insult-throwing...again
Overlooking the fact that I regularly take great care to do so... as has been discussed.
Astle's been a star: he's just not at the moment. He hasn't played a lot of cricket in the last six months and is out of form, which can get horribly exposed when you're opening on two-paced pitches against quality bowling . He's scored centuries in both tests and ODIs against most opposition.yes & scring runs vs the top attacks compared to mediocre/average one's seperates the best from the rest. Thats why Astle can't be called a star..
Surely the least descriptive smiley ever... can mean all sorts of things.
Great, yet more chances for that perennial-failure Lou Vincent... and remind me again what Cumming's one-day averages are?Astle's been a star: he's just not at the moment. He hasn't played a lot of cricket in the last six months and is out of form, which can get horribly exposed when you're opening on two-paced pitches against quality bowling . He's scored centuries in both tests and ODIs against most opposition.
He could do with a solid opening partner, rather than Fleming - who is in just as bad form?
John Bracewell, if you are indeed on cricketweb looking for some ideas, how about sending over Vincent or Cumming over to address the need for a form opener.
If you hover your mouse over the smiley, it says exactly what it means.Surely the least descriptive smiley ever... can mean all sorts of things.
I don't think the selectors have ever forgiven Papps for being sconed by Brett Lee. Shame reallyWhere's Michael Papps at these days? His performances in the few ODIs he played at least weren't bad...
I know - it says "huh", which can mean all sorts of things, really... and the expression is more bemused than anything else.If you hover your mouse over the smiley, it says exactly what it means.
That's correct, poindexter. I was indeed bemused by the link you provided, which seems to bear no relation to what you were talking about, especially seeing as the poster linked to isn't you.I know - it says "huh", which can mean all sorts of things, really... and the expression is more bemused than anything else.