Coronis
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Sames.The more I look deeper into their records, the more I start to believe that Pigeon > MaCo is much more of a realistic possibility than I previously thought.
Sames.The more I look deeper into their records, the more I start to believe that Pigeon > MaCo is much more of a realistic possibility than I previously thought.
I have McGrath as my third best fast bowler but it is very obvious that McGrath has holes in his record.The more I look deeper into their records, the more I start to believe that Pigeon > MaCo is much more of a realistic possibility than I previously thought.
His SA record is not mediocre. It's not great but far from mediocre. In Asia, his record in IND is great which was the best batting team of his era. It's true though he could be a bit neutralized on flatter asian wickets.I have McGrath as my third best fast bowler but it is very obvious that McGrath has holes in his record.
1. Against the second best team of his era, his record is just mediocre.
17 Tests. 57 wkts @ 27.3 and 2 5-Fers.
2. His record in SL & Pak
in SL : 4 Tests. 10 wickets @ 29
in Pak : 5 Tests. 19 wickets @ 31
3. Just one 5-Fer in 17 Tests in Asia
Actually he didn't that much. His record in SA is actually pretty good. At home lies the issue:isn't his SA record just bad because he played them a lot early on when he was a **** bowler?
eh then it's fine imo.Actually he didn't that much. His record in SA is actually pretty good. At home lies the issue:
1994: 1 match 2 wkts @31 avg
1997-98: 2 matches 4 wkts @34 avg
2001-02: 3 matches 14 wkts @25 avg
2005-06: 3 matches 8 wkts @40.63
14 matches. 51 wickets @ 26. 2 5-Ferisn't his SA record just bad because he played them a lot early on when he was a **** bowler?
that's better, but it seems like his struggles against them were home limited.14 matches. 51 wickets @ 26. 2 5-Fer
Warne>Maco imo.**** Pigeon, Go Warnie
Is this why no one asks for your opinions???Warne>Maco imo.
wow and here I thought I could give up shitting on the spinnersWarne>Maco imo.
This is astonishingly stupid. For most of Wasim's career (until the mid/late 90s), WI were either the strongest or second strongest team in the world and Akram averaged like 21 against them in that timeframe. And he only played 4 games vs SA.I've a bit of a problem with Wasim's numbers against the good batting lineups of his time (IE team averages over 30, Which is SA/Ind/Aus), it's 108 @ 27.5 with 62 SR and 3.7WPM
As a spinner*Is this why no one asks for your opinions???
Wait how's it fine if you suck at homeeh then it's fine imo.
Its his personal business, bro.Wait how's it fine if you suck at home
West Indies in the early 90s clearly has inferior output to Australia and India, it's closer to England's than it is to India's or Australia'sThis is astonishingly stupid. For most of Wasim's career (until the mid/late 90s), WI were either the strongest or second strongest team in the world and Akram averaged like 21 against them in that timeframe. And he only played 4 games vs SA.
![]()
Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com
In fact, India and England were pretty mid for most of Akram's career. So if anything he had way worse numbers vs the worse teams than he did vs the best. You're all backwards here.